Постови у којима сам цитиран

Oh, that's good. that'll probably even out japan and china, and on second thought, the rest should be pretty balanced. I want to play the scenario after these changes, looks really nice

The allies are really underpowered in this scenario. China is likely to lose out within a few turns if Japan plays correctly (the two most money-producing countries have japanese inf next to them), not to mention Japan has a huge income advantage. China needs a slight buff, in income or by removing japanese inf near those two countries (I know it's for history but balance is important) and the axis as a whole needs a slight nerf (russia vs europe won't work out)

Цитирај:

"There is no skill or luck with winning a battle, whoever has the most soldiers pretty much wins."

>implying it doesn't take skill to get more soldiers onto a front

Цитирај:

"Difficult Learning Curve"

yeah, just a mad noob. I agree though, I thought aw was junk until I got to like rank 4 and actually understood the game. But everything else he mentioned is just butthurt (see: 'uneven battle system').

Also, lol @ this caption: Apparently the Only Countries Worth Invading Are In Europe

>china
>india
>U.S.

also he's playing a europe map. I don't trust this review at all, if you can't tell that there are different maps that correspond to the environment you play in, you're just dumb. and I think this guy is just that

Написао iStompy, 23.11.2011 at 21:53

It is very, very easy.

no it's not. pls prove it to me

Написао Guest, 23.11.2011 at 19:51

Написао Aristosseur, 23.11.2011 at 19:48

I just lost to vaglneer playing germany IF and I was SM spain and got rome, paris, london 1st turn, I also walled rome london same turn, wall glitched them next turn but still got owned. So it's pretty apparent germany IF is op and sixstars didn't have much to do with his "lol funny to see after I win"

I dont see how you could loose to Germany IF as SPain SM...You must be terrible. Sorry, that is not possible if you take UK, PAris and Italy first turn.

nope...

over 3 turns, the units capped by neutrals gets even between germany and spain SM. and after those 3 turns, germany will have at least 1k+ more income than SM spain. it's OP and you know it, pls2notchangestratbecuaseyouuseit

Написао Guest, 23.11.2011 at 19:32

Lols, how hilarious to find this thread after I beat VAG with Germany IF.

i've beaten better people than myself and yourself with IF germany sry. this reason alone makes it OP

Написао iStompy, 23.11.2011 at 19:29

Sorry, 2 HP would make it less epic. Just add cost to the units so they learn to value Infantry instead of spamming it all around. 2 HP would make it too similar to Perfect Defense.

no, HP is a completely different stat...also, aristo, who is the best IF player in the game, agrees on this nerf. I think this should stand.

Написао Guest14502, 23.11.2011 at 19:16

It was terrible at +2, this is a bad idea, sorry. Why are there multiple threads about this? I'm going to lock the other one and can discuss this here.

IF wasn't nearly as developed back then as it is now. Strats change and get better over time (see: GW), also it was fine at +2

Написао iStompy, 23.11.2011 at 19:11

>IF Germany cannot be beat
no
try harder noob

Since Iron Fist units are stronger, make them more expensive (so they can have less) +30 cost for all units. Remove transport nerf. Germany IF will be done.

pls try playing it first. also, you weren't here when there was +2 HP, so you wouldn't know...the transport nerf has obviously failed as IF is just an OP faceroll, +2 HP worked pretty well (it surely was not OP, but was not underpowered), so IF should revert back to that.

Cost nerfs never work also, sorry

Make IF have 2 HP and remove the transport nerf

+2 HP was fine, but nobody used IF until rushka/aristo in tournament, so pls bring it back to that, it's ridiculously OP. With this strat basically whoever gets 1st pick in a 1v1 wins (IF Germany cannot be beat)

Написао Ivan, 21.11.2011 at 12:37

Написао VAGlNEER 2.0, 27.10.2011 at 19:42

Elo rating system
- player-rankings based on SP doesn't show a players skill, the following suggestions would also increase the competition in this game and be another step to make Afterwind the leading strategy-browser-game
-> implement a ladder ranking with brackets
-> point-system similar to ELO (http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Elo_rating_system)
-> brackets could be: rated 1vs1, rated team-games: 2vs2, 3vs3
-> players would have to stay in their team, if the leave it to join another they loose their rank


pls add this, would add a whole new *refreshing* dimension to the game
the game's updates have been coming slowly, and something like this would prob make up for them

Yes, we were considering using the ELO system, but there are many difficulties with this. For example, the player lineup in games is very fluid: players join and leave - and some of them never even meet (one already left, another joined later). Determining who played against who is very complicated. Then, we really don't want to reduce player SP at any point (currently it only happens in duels, which are optional) - this would lead to the top players hardly ever getting any SP and more often losing it. Hardly a good motivation.

You should add it as a separate system, kinda like duel SP. In order for it to work you'd need to have an ELO room or a special ELO game, just to guarantee the match is ranked. Also, ELO should only be used for 1v1's, so regular duel rules can apply and work well with this system.

Написао the99percent, 20.11.2011 at 19:48

It all depends who get's first move. The attacker, or the guy moving his wall back into the city. Cause that's how the game works, 50/50 on who gets to move first remeber?

yes, but if walls are always defensive (as I suggested), then walls will never be able to go back. it should work if it's possible to make walls ONLY defend

Написао the99percent, 20.11.2011 at 18:52

Написао VAGlNEER 2.0, 20.11.2011 at 16:40

All you need to do is make any wall unit attacked to be turnblocked...if you think about it, if the unit never goes back into the cap, the wall can't reform. If the wall is blocked, it can't go back into the city/cap and the wall will be broken

idk if there are any flaws to this, point them out please

our attack never happens and they get to rebuild the wall, for an infinite wall. That is the glitch.

The Flaw is, if they make their first move to move a unit back into cap , then your attack never happens and they get to rebuild the wall, for an infinite wall. That is the glitch.

you're not getting my point, if you make the units in the wall defend (rather than move back into the cap), then they won't be able to move back into the cap

All you need to do is make any wall unit attacked to be turnblocked...if you think about it, if the unit never goes back into the cap, the wall can't reform. If the wall is blocked, it can't go back into the city/cap and the wall will be broken

idk if there are any flaws to this, point them out please

Keep atk nerf, remove cost nerf. militia come free with every country/city cap, so an atk nerf OR a defense nerf is pretty necessary

Написао Garde, 20.11.2011 at 12:33

Написао VAGlNEER 2.0, 20.11.2011 at 11:57

Написао Garde, 19.11.2011 at 23:51

Написао VAGlNEER 2.0, 19.11.2011 at 22:52

You should work on your grammar Gard, things aren't looking so bright in your passage.

If you we're a tad smarter you would see all I did was replace every "tik" with SRB, to preserve lulz I didn't change the grammar. If I had, it would've been my own work, but to make it funny, I had to keep the original work intact while making my point.

OMG WAIT U DID THAT OMG SO ORIGINAL AND FUNNY XXAAXXAXAXA

also, if you wanted to make your point stronger you'd know that it's "were", not "we're", nice try though...
(also, of course I got that, I pointed out the flaws in your shitty post because it wasn't funny and all around poorly thought out and bad)

I'm not starting a damned flame war with your lonely ass, just drop it.

last post here, but aren't you the one complaining about being lonely and hated all the time? ;__;

Написао Garde, 19.11.2011 at 23:51

Написао VAGlNEER 2.0, 19.11.2011 at 22:52

You should work on your grammar Gard, things aren't looking so bright in your passage.

If you we're a tad smarter you would see all I did was replace every "tik" with SRB, to preserve lulz I didn't change the grammar. If I had, it would've been my own work, but to make it funny, I had to keep the original work intact while making my point.

OMG WAIT U DID THAT OMG SO ORIGINAL AND FUNNY XXAAXXAXAXA

also, if you wanted to make your point stronger you'd know that it's "were", not "we're", nice try though...
(also, of course I got that, I pointed out the flaws in your shitty post because it wasn't funny and all around poorly thought out and bad)

It's pretty tedious to look at which medals are nearing completion (especially when there are tons of medals), adding a progress bar (similar to the one for next rank in SP, which can be seen in the page with games) would be really simple and helpful.

You should work on your grammar Gard, things aren't looking so bright in your passage.

In this post, I would like to share with you some thoughts I originally organized to initiate meaningful change. I will start this discussion by arguing that callow witlings represent one of the most vainglorious wings of caustic terrorism you can find. Then, I will present evidence that we must reach out to people with the message that it does not require a Sherlock Holmes to prove that Atty. Tik Tok is emotionally insecure and has a difficult time admitting that he's wrong. We must alert people of that. We must educate them. We must inspire them. And we must encourage them to argue about his taradiddles.
It is not uncommon for Tik to victimize the innocent, penalize the victim for making any effort to defend himself, and then paint the whole venom-spouting affair as some great benefit to humanity. As witnesses to mankind's inner dissatisfaction, we must let him know, in no uncertain terms, that he is an adept at selling otherwise perfectly reasonable people the idée fixe that coercion in the name of liberty is a valid use of state power. Here, too, the exception proves the rule: If you'll allow me a minor dysphemism, blaming unsympathetic frotteurism on homicidal turncoats is one of his favorite themes. Or, to phrase that a little more politely, nothing unites people like a common enemy. That's why I would encourage everybody to take some shots of their own at Tik by reprimanding him for putting callous protestors on the federal payroll. Although some violent imbeciles reluctantly concede that some of his anal-retentive, horny obiter dicta are so self-contradictory, they're their own refutation, they invariably deny that unlike him, when I make a mistake I'm willing to admit it. Consequently, if—and I'm bending over backwards to maintain the illusion of "innocent until proven guilty"—Tik were not actually responsible for trying to undermine the foundations of society until a single thrust suffices to make the entire edifice collapse, then I'd stop saying that I cannot believe how many actual, physical, breathing, thinking people have fallen for Tik's subterfuge. I'm thoroughly stunned.
Tik recently went through a careerism phase in which he tried repeatedly to hurt people's feelings. In fact, I'm not convinced that this phase of his has entirely passed. My evidence is that what I wrote just a moment ago is not the paranoid rambling of an ignominious wacko. It's a fact. Here's an idea: Instead of giving him the ability to punish dissent through intimidation, public ridicule, economic exclusion, imprisonment, and most extremely, death, why don't we shed a little light on some of the ignorant prejudices that reside within his pea-sized brain? If we do, we'll then be able to remind him about the concept of truth in advertising. So remember kids, if you want to cause an increase in disease, egotism, crime, and vice, all you have to do is agree to let Tik challenge all I stand for. In short, I will not stand by and let anyone twist my words or change my position in order to serve some fork-tongued political strategy.

I kill anyone who says i am a faget, rule of thumb rly

I agree with the original post. The rules are very vague and are easily exploitable by mods (can mute/ban someone for no reason due to vagueness of rules), and should be specified. Generally, law doesn't work with 4 very vague ideas.

Написао Garde, 13.11.2011 at 14:30

Написао Houdini, 13.11.2011 at 14:03

Написао YOBA, 13.11.2011 at 09:41

Now back on topic. If you really want to add more islands, make a separate thread about it. This is all taking away from my proposal which is completely unrelated to Houdini's.

This is completely related and on topic, YOBA. This thread is presenting a problem and a solution. My suggestion is aimed at the problem presented by this thread. The islands are a suggestion to counter the proposal that "world games are boring". It is on topic to discuss islands in this thread. Making another thread would be stupid, because this is the thread which the suggestion pertains to.

The name of the thread is "World games are boring; a solution (movement range increments)", meaning it is the AUTHOR'S solution he want's to talk about. Not your's. If you find your idea good, please go make a thread about it. The author would like to talk about his idea only, so please listen to him.

Wrong. A suggestion thread gathers ideas on one topic and attempts to improve it -- after all, we ARE talking about the authors suggestion, but we're improving it. Also, the name of the title is "World games are boring; a solution (movement range increments)," so improving movement range is to be discussed here. You're not making any sense at all.


Also, adding islands IS a solution to this problem. It adds more 'checkpoints' in oceans, which is the main problem with world games. I don't see how Houdini's suggestion is unrelated at all really, you guys are just acting really shallow.

Написао MerckSaint, 13.11.2011 at 12:21

I dont know why we are messing with guerrilla warfare it was perfect I already hated playing in Europe against blitz tank gen or sky menace but with my beloved guerrillas altered for the worst i will never 1v1 in Europe again

it was op as fuck bro

Написао the99percent, 12.11.2011 at 13:30

Whur's my frikken award.

Worst at hacking a prominent gaming company: SonyHaxor

Написао YOBA, 12.11.2011 at 15:56

Crank dat was a fucking terrible song and a shame on the history of rap music.

All song-specific dances are fucking terrible. The Macarena, Single Lady, Crank Dat, all of them! They should be removed from the premises with utmost prejudice

stopped reading after insulting the macarena.

you shall die in the depths of hell

Написао YOBA, 11.11.2011 at 16:00

Написао VAGlNEER 2.0, 10.11.2011 at 21:58

Most likely to die because of shootings due to playing Skyrim: Fruit

Skyrim doesn't even have guns? I don't think many gun-waving gangsters like LilD play it either.

I meant I'm going to shoot him cos he plays it (fag level +30)

Написао Guest, 11.11.2011 at 00:42

Vaglneer awards <3.
Also besided the fact that i'm upset for getting not a god tier award, I really agree with the other awards, but

Написао VAGlNEER 2.0, 10.11.2011 at 21:58

Most 3rd World: The ZOG

sry, but Himmler is way more 3rd world. He has barely enough money to buy food and that is also the reason why he has no premium. Please regard. (Maybe a small award for Himmler so no qqing.)

yes but we always joke how ZOG is such third world junglenets

Написао Desu, 10.11.2011 at 22:08

Most mysterious: Desu


This is an interesting prospect. I could like.. Maybe.

i don't usually drink beer, but when I do, i drink dos equis

you are the most interesting man in the world