Пронађено резултата: 1704
Учитавање...
Учитавање...
Написао PleaseMe, Данас at 13:30

Mexico and USA so happy for the next world cup

USA AHAHHAHAHAHAHHAHAH, USA team would lose to any U16 team ahahahha
Учитавање...
Учитавање...
Mexico and USA so happy for the next world cup
Учитавање...
Учитавање...
In! <3
Учитавање...
Учитавање...
Sid
Данас у [DENIED] Last Appeal
Didn't follow the format, nothing more than that needs to be said, but Croat did give you a nice explanation.
Учитавање...
Учитавање...
Написао stalin5678, Данас at 12:51

Yes the us did freak out when the soviets placed nukes in cuba and the reason why they casually put nukes in turkey was because they were selfish and never cared about what the ussr wanted. It was all a game of cat and mouse. Each one trying to outsmart the other. Here both us and ussr are cats and mouses in their own fields. The threat of soviet russia was real as they wanted the entire world under their rule. They wanted to unite their people using other nations as demons. And for the matter of pakistan and india, it is not balanced. India has made a retaliatory strike policy for their nukes which means they will only strike back in retaliation. Meanwhile pakistan is different, their country has been through military dictatorships alot so they made a first strike policy, which means they will launch their nukes at any case of war. Secondly Pakistan has also been waging guerrilla warfare inside india by aiding islamic fundamentalists and kashmiris to strike india. We cannot let the russian gain an inch of ground nor advantage over others as it will make them feel more emboldened to strike other targets that are in their interest. Eg baltic nations. Then about the us invading other countries and capturing people. The invasion of iraq was a direct propaganda move by the conservatives in usa. Which means not all of the people supported it as they used the excuse of 9/11 and the proapect of iraq building nukes. The same goes for libya. They have invaded alot of nations as they wanted theri type of democracy in those lands. Which i do not clearly support nor clearly detest. But being a superpower they have to help their allies and their interests to secure more friendships and prove that they will defend you. The reason why romania had allowed nukes to be set up there was due to their fear of russia. They wanted an alliance with usa and they got one. So it is the us's policy to defend their allies.
I would never allow russia to gt what they want in ukraine as it will remind us of adolf hitler and his 'promises'. The appeasement is the most greatest example of what russia is trying to do with the us and the rest of the world


1) I acknowledge your comment about Pakistan-India. I support India in that conflict because from my view, i see Pakistan provoking India, i need more information to see from pakistani side proving India provokes them. I also see Kashmir as Indian territory, but i don't have complete picture about that place. Although, i assume that after independence, the territory belongs to India as it was before colonization.

2) In US-Russia conflict, you are choosing sides. You are choosing one empire over another. I am trying to not choose a side, but if others choose, then i must choose as well so i don't lag behind which eventually can backfire if enemy empire win.

What gives USA more right in Iraq than Russia in Ukraine? Or USA in Libya than Russia in Baltic? How can one empire's meddling be wanted and the other detested, unless you are choosing side?

3) Using Hitler as example doesn't suit well in an argument and debate (godwin law), you can't compare something so evil with a modern country, because not only you paint that country black, but you also water down real crimes against humanity perpetrated by hitler.
Учитавање...
Учитавање...
Написао Helixforce30, Данас at 12:54

How do i join

You must be at least rank 6 to join.
Учитавање...
Учитавање...
How do i join
Учитавање...
Учитавање...
Написао Skanderbeg, Данас at 10:36

Написао stalin5678, 15.04.2021 at 05:36

the only true moments of peace we ever had was from 1815-1830, 1914-1930 and 1991-1998. if u observe all the peace times comes just after a war. and every war costs more than a million lives. we have more than a dozen nuclear armed countries which could signal the destruction of millions or billions. if we go for war. then what einstein said will be correct " i don't know what weapons will be used in ww3, but i do know that ww4 will be fought using sticks and stones"


Написао stalin5678, 15.04.2021 at 05:45

And then talking about the anxiousness about a country' motives. china and japan were a threat to each other since the beginning of time. from the ghosts of tsushima to the yi sun-sin and to the ww2 period. they have lived to coexist with the dangers next to them. another example is india and pakistan. we have fought against each other since the beginning of our independence. there are frequent air skirmishes, border attacks and insurgent threats. but we have been able to coexist and deescalate the threat every time. but now the stakes are even higher since both of them have nukes. russia can survive the threats faced by a ukrainian nato. But if we let the russians win. then the next target will be warsaw, then berlin, paris, london and so on. they will never stop their ambitions as long as a soviet loyalist ike putin is on the presidency. we have to keep bold actions. for each country that falls to nationalism or anarchy. our countries will be a step closer towards it, regardless of the cultures, economy and history.


There must be balance of power (great powers), you used good example of Pakistan vs India, they have nukes and now its balanced, but USA-Russia front is not balanced due to US freaking out when USSR tried to place nukes on Cuba, while USA casually placed nukes in Turkey back then, and today casually in Poland, Czechia and Romania.

For example Romania, like France in NATO, was outside command chain in Warsaw Pact, and now when they are in NATO they have US bases and nukes, now they are legitimate target in case of WW3, why do they risk that?

You say Ukraine in NATO is not a problem, but if you let Russia win (but you dont say win where? ww3 or ukraine?) then next target is warsaw, berlin, london. But what about USA? They agreed to end Cold War in 1989 with USSR and when USSR collapsed 2 years later, they became the largest empire on earth; invading nations across the globe, literally everywhere, kidnapping people in americas, africa, europe, asia, and sending them back to black sites.

I don't how can you fear more potential Russia than real USA, it doesn't make sense. To accept current US oppression only because potential future Russia can invade London sounds very pessimistic and defeatist to me.

Yes the us did freak out when the soviets placed nukes in cuba and the reason why they casually put nukes in turkey was because they were selfish and never cared about what the ussr wanted. It was all a game of cat and mouse. Each one trying to outsmart the other. Here both us and ussr are cats and mouses in their own fields. The threat of soviet russia was real as they wanted the entire world under their rule. They wanted to unite their people using other nations as demons. And for the matter of pakistan and india, it is not balanced. India has made a retaliatory strike policy for their nukes which means they will only strike back in retaliation. Meanwhile pakistan is different, their country has been through military dictatorships alot so they made a first strike policy, which means they will launch their nukes at any case of war. Secondly Pakistan has also been waging guerrilla warfare inside india by aiding islamic fundamentalists and kashmiris to strike india. We cannot let the russian gain an inch of ground nor advantage over others as it will make them feel more emboldened to strike other targets that are in their interest. Eg baltic nations. Then about the us invading other countries and capturing people. The invasion of iraq was a direct propaganda move by the conservatives in usa. Which means not all of the people supported it as they used the excuse of 9/11 and the proapect of iraq building nukes. The same goes for libya. They have invaded alot of nations as they wanted theri type of democracy in those lands. Which i do not clearly support nor clearly detest. But being a superpower they have to help their allies and their interests to secure more friendships and prove that they will defend you. The reason why romania had allowed nukes to be set up there was due to their fear of russia. They wanted an alliance with usa and they got one. So it is the us's policy to defend their allies.
I would never allow russia to gt what they want in ukraine as it will remind us of adolf hitler and his 'promises'. The appeasement is the most greatest example of what russia is trying to do with the us and the rest of the world
Учитавање...
Учитавање...
Данас у Paradox is back.
Написао Croat, Данас at 03:58

Написао cascaval, 19.04.2021 at 21:07

Isn't this the dude that started like 30 coalitions?


Who are you and what is wrong with your head?

ASDFASDFA
Учитавање...
Учитавање...
Цитирај:
You say Ukraine in NATO is not a problem, but if you let Russia win (but you dont say win where? ww3 or ukraine?)

I meant if we let russia get what they want . Then they will win in ukraine
Учитавање...
Учитавање...
Данас у Paradox is back.
Написао Croat, Данас at 03:58

Написао cascaval, 19.04.2021 at 21:07

Isn't this the dude that started like 30 coalitions?


Who are you and what is wrong with your head?


Must've been some other Croat
Учитавање...
Учитавање...
Germany opted for cuckiness and didnt join.
Учитавање...
Учитавање...
Написао ITSGG1122, 15.04.2021 at 05:09

Stalin killed more men than hitler.


Im just here to count before gigi gets muted again
Учитавање...
Учитавање...
Atwarburg v.2
Учитавање...
Учитавање...
Написао Nero, 31.03.2021 at 13:03

He didn't get enough attention on that one so he had to make another


I enjoy coming back to talk to afterwind friends and read forum, if it triggers you, that's just bonus
Учитавање...
Учитавање...
Написао stalin5678, 15.04.2021 at 05:36

the only true moments of peace we ever had was from 1815-1830, 1914-1930 and 1991-1998. if u observe all the peace times comes just after a war. and every war costs more than a million lives. we have more than a dozen nuclear armed countries which could signal the destruction of millions or billions. if we go for war. then what einstein said will be correct " i don't know what weapons will be used in ww3, but i do know that ww4 will be fought using sticks and stones"


Написао stalin5678, 15.04.2021 at 05:45

And then talking about the anxiousness about a country' motives. china and japan were a threat to each other since the beginning of time. from the ghosts of tsushima to the yi sun-sin and to the ww2 period. they have lived to coexist with the dangers next to them. another example is india and pakistan. we have fought against each other since the beginning of our independence. there are frequent air skirmishes, border attacks and insurgent threats. but we have been able to coexist and deescalate the threat every time. but now the stakes are even higher since both of them have nukes. russia can survive the threats faced by a ukrainian nato. But if we let the russians win. then the next target will be warsaw, then berlin, paris, london and so on. they will never stop their ambitions as long as a soviet loyalist ike putin is on the presidency. we have to keep bold actions. for each country that falls to nationalism or anarchy. our countries will be a step closer towards it, regardless of the cultures, economy and history.


There must be balance of power (great powers), you used good example of Pakistan vs India, they have nukes and now its balanced, but USA-Russia front is not balanced due to US freaking out when USSR tried to place nukes on Cuba, while USA casually placed nukes in Turkey back then, and today casually in Poland, Czechia and Romania.

For example Romania, like France in NATO, was outside command chain in Warsaw Pact, and now when they are in NATO they have US bases and nukes, now they are legitimate target in case of WW3, why do they risk that?

You say Ukraine in NATO is not a problem, but if you let Russia win (but you dont say win where? ww3 or ukraine?) then next target is warsaw, berlin, london. But what about USA? They agreed to end Cold War in 1989 with USSR and when USSR collapsed 2 years later, they became the largest empire on earth; invading nations across the globe, literally everywhere, kidnapping people in americas, africa, europe, asia, and sending them back to black sites.

I don't how can you fear more potential Russia than real USA, it doesn't make sense. To accept current US oppression only because potential future Russia can invade London sounds very pessimistic and defeatist to me.
Учитавање...
Учитавање...
Написао Leo, 19.04.2021 at 19:09

Bad idea. Big European games will lose their prestige, domestic leagues will get disbanded, and small teams will suffer. It's just a positive feedback loop for the top teams at this point. If football was always like this since day1 none will complain. But we have 70 years of history behind us we can't simply rewrite. Football needs something fresh but not this.

But from perspective of Barça supporter, maybe we need this or we go bankrupt D


"We go bankrupt", no my friend the owners get bankrupt. The super league officials themselves have stated they their FIRST priority is profit and that football along with the fans are their SECOND priority, if the super league happens I will stop supporting the club whom I have followed for a decade now.
Учитавање...
Учитавање...
Данас у Wall abuse
Написао Kaska, Данас at 09:52

Написао Witch-Doctor, Данас at 09:31

Написао Kaska, Данас at 09:25

Atwar (what it claims to be) : the art of strategy

Atwar (what it actually is) : the art of improving nerds mechanisms and bug abuse.


These "nerd mechanism" is hardly difficult for anybody to learn. There's many guides on them and takes no more effort to learn them than learning a new shortcut for expansions. You might as well call doing specific shortcuts and expansions nerd mechanisms as well.


I do, shortcuts are the nerdiest thing on earth. Same goes for the latemove thing.

I just mean that being good at atwar has nothing to do with being good at strategy

You finally discovered that atwar was a nerd game good job
Учитавање...
Учитавање...
Данас у Wall abuse
OK. I retract my previous argument. Although not a bannable offense. Still a slimey way to play.
Учитавање...
Учитавање...
Данас у Wall abuse
Написао Witch-Doctor, Данас at 09:31

Написао Kaska, Данас at 09:25

Atwar (what it claims to be) : the art of strategy

Atwar (what it actually is) : the art of improving nerds mechanisms and bug abuse.


These "nerd mechanism" is hardly difficult for anybody to learn. There's many guides on them and takes no more effort to learn them than learning a new shortcut for expansions. You might as well call doing specific shortcuts and expansions nerd mechanisms as well.


I do, shortcuts are the nerdiest thing on earth. Same goes for the latemove thing.

I just mean that being good at atwar has nothing to do with being good at strategy
Учитавање...
Учитавање...
Gg pavle 2-o
https://prnt.sc/11rcecc
https://prnt.sc/11rcgak
but if you still think we need a 3rd match i'll do as you say
Учитавање...
Учитавање...
Данас у [DENIED] Last Appeal
Yes, to anyone with common sense it really 'doesn't' seem suspicious that you have alt accounts with these names:
CALCULATOR
LAPTOP
DEODORANT
REFRIGERATOR
But account called TELEVISION is suddenly your brother. Out of all house stuff, you chosen TELEVISION to be your brother





On the day of mentioned clan wars, you were sharing both, client and IP between each other.
What are you two, swapping on chair while playing on 3 out of 4 accounts in a single game?


I don't trust you and I am not going to do anything related to you anymore. You had such a bitchy demanding attitude towards myself, it seemed that I abused rules, not you. Whatsmore, you were seeking for another staff member to deal with your case instead of me, so now wait if Dave is going to have mercy or not. Good luck
Учитавање...
Учитавање...
Написао Kaska, Данас at 09:20

Don't tell me you found that gif while sending me all these fuck you pictures yesterday...


Учитавање...
Учитавање...
Данас у Wall abuse
Написао Kaska, Данас at 09:25

Atwar (what it claims to be) : the art of strategy

Atwar (what it actually is) : the art of improving nerds mechanisms and bug abuse.


These "nerd mechanism" is hardly difficult for anybody to learn. There's many guides on them and takes no more effort to learn them than learning a new shortcut for expansions. You might as well call doing specific shortcuts and expansions nerd mechanisms as well.
Учитавање...
Учитавање...
Цитирај:
Написао PleaseMe, 19.04.2021 at 13:41

Написао Lelouch., 19.04.2021 at 13:39


People will dodge us even if we don't rewall based on your common sense. They dodge us because they think we're hacking.

Well what's more important? Staying in a clan with some friends or clan warring? If you really want to cw then you could make your own clan. But if you want to play cws with your friends that have been accused then that's on you and you will have to deal with the backlash that comes with that.


When mirage was just Croat, Sphinx, and I, we still got dodged all the time. Things never change.
Учитавање...
Учитавање...
Atwar is dead already
Учитавање...
Учитавање...
Данас у Wall abuse
Atwar (what it claims to be) : the art of strategy

Atwar (what it actually is) : the art of improving nerds mechanisms and bug abuse.
Учитавање...
Учитавање...
Написао Sascha, Данас at 09:14

Написао Nero, 19.04.2021 at 23:03

....





Don't tell me you found that gif while sending me all these fuck you pictures yesterday...
Учитавање...
Учитавање...
Написао Nero, 19.04.2021 at 23:03

....


Учитавање...
Учитавање...
atWar

About Us
Contact

приватност | Услови сервиса | Банери | Partners

Copyright © 2021 atWar. All rights reserved.

Придружи нам се на

Прошири гласине