Пронађено резултата: 1175
Hello dear afterwind / at-war gamers.

My close friend, who use to play this game with me, doberman211
(Dark Soban http://atwar-game.com/users/profile.php?user_id=26356),
has published the first book of his science-fiction series. It is called
"Encounters: a Wormspace Novel". I helped him with the editing and
therefore have read it. It is fantastic and definitely worth reading if you
are a sci-fi fan.

You can purchase it as a paperback book for 10$ or as an ebook for 5$.

Here is the amazon link:
https://www.amazon.com/Encounters-Wormspace-Kurtis-Millette/dp/1522089020/ref=sr_1_fkmr0_1?s=books&ie=UTF8&qid=1502986085&sr=1-1-fkmr0&keywords=encounters+a+wormspace+novel+millette


Here is what the front cover looks like:
http://imgur.com/a/wGHMY


Here is the synopsis:
"Join us as we follow Kimora Hera'ur on her journey to an alien world: Terrah.
Her brother, admiral Hakrus, defends this world and all others of the Periphery
from the dangers of the Taigian Empire. Tiamat has been stranded there for
over a century, working with Charles West and other military personnel in desert
campaigns that remind him of home. Shane Scott has spent his entire life
second-guessing himself around the mysterious disappearance of his father,
only to find answers in the alien girl he discovers stranded and alone in the
frigid Canadian north circa 2062. It all comes together in the end..."


Finally, for more details, check out his website:
https://www.klmbooks.com/
https://www.klmbooks.com/wormspace-1/


Please support a fellow afterwinder!
Please support a fellow at-war sky menace master!
Учитавање...
Учитавање...
06.05.2015 у Ban me immediately
For 200 days. salutations
Учитавање...
Учитавање...
Написао Waffel, 30.09.2014 at 13:37

Написао tophat, 23.09.2014 at 07:15



Thank you tophats! I appreciate it, anyways do you know the release date?


no.
Учитавање...
Учитавање...
You guys are all nerds <3
Учитавање...
Учитавање...
Учитавање...
Учитавање...
17.09.2014 у Coalition ELO
Написао Spart, 17.09.2014 at 11:37

Написао tophat, 17.09.2014 at 09:33

Nice stealings of cow's idea.


I don't know which idea you are talking about, but either way, it is possible for two people to come up with similar ideas without ever having seen the other's work. This has actually happened many times throughout history. So, please refrain from using the word "stealing" unless something has actually been stolen.

With that said, I know how big of a proponent of ELO that Cow was, so I am not surprised at all if he had presented a similar idea at some point in the past. Rather than accuse someone of stealing though, wouldn't it be better to link someone to the topic so that they could see it rather than instantly accusing them of stealing?


I am clearly not accusing you of stealing. Afterwind definition of clearly and stealing are modified kk.
Учитавање...
Учитавање...
17.09.2014 у Coalition ELO
Nice stealings of cow's idea.

Yes, this should have always been implemented.
Учитавање...
Учитавање...
You're the worst troll ever. unoriginal.
Учитавање...
Учитавање...
Learned myself really.

As a noob however, I would always look to pinheiro for advice.
Учитавање...
Учитавање...
Написао Skanderbeg, 12.09.2014 at 04:44

Написао tophat, 11.09.2014 at 18:41

Well, I'm not one to speak on behalf of Americans, but certainly some probably don't give a shit about swearing oath to God. Sure they might do it, but they probably see it as very insignificant to their personal beliefs and way of life. Therefore, to those individuals who don't believe in God, the notion of them being oppressed is completely and utterly absent. Despite America having set beliefs for its country and a particular national pride, the country itself and its respective citizens are still individualistic more than anything else.

As for the government saying their citizens are completely free, well, it's obvious that that's just pure bullshit. So I agree with you there, and the notion of the government slowly taking away liberties by the use of fear.

So to return to your original statements; some Americans are atheists and are fighting against the government to change their laws accordingly; some are atheists who just don't give a shit; some believe in God and adhere to their government; and some believe in God and don't give a shit as to the implications this belief has with their government. And of course, there are more variations, I just listed a few.

Americans are not as generalized as you described them to be... And same goes for all western countries; individualism makes these considerations much more complex.


Thank you for sane reply.

I like asking questions like these recently, because many westerns accuse Russia and USSR for oppression and totalitarism but when infact americans are doing exactly the same thing they are talking about for Russia.

In USSR you have to swear loyalty to the Party, in USA to the God. so whats the difference, that isnt freedom when you force people to swear to someone/something they dont believe to.

http://www.airforcetimes.com/article/20140909/NEWS05/309090065/Atheist-airman-must-swear-help-me-God-get-out-November They will kick an atheist from the army because he didnt swear oath and mentioned God. If that happened in USSR or China where you swear loyalty to the Party, CNN would spam two weeks how soviets and chinese are oppressive and their citizens are poor and no future.


Well USA and Russia foreign policies are atrocious. Neither of them are in the right. They're both hypocrites across the board.
Учитавање...
Учитавање...
Написао Skanderbeg, 11.09.2014 at 15:40

Написао tophat, 11.09.2014 at 12:59

Tito, not all americans are atheists and not all americans believe god blesses america.

You made a massive statement from ignorance, and consequently, a conclusion from fallacy.


So not all americans believe in God, but americans still swear oath to God? Why? I see conflict of interest there.

Isnt america secular state? Or first amandmend is made to be ignored?

Doesnt that mean americans who dont believe in God are oppressed, as other americans doesnt give them liberty? So why then USA lie how their country is free and brave when in reality they take away liberties and oppress their countrymen(and globe) because of their fears.

You westerns are really shadowy and shrouded with mistery(double-standards), i will really never understand you.


Well, I'm not one to speak on behalf of Americans, but certainly some probably don't give a shit about swearing oath to God. Sure they might do it, but they probably see it as very insignificant to their personal beliefs and way of life. Therefore, to those individuals who don't believe in God, the notion of them being oppressed is completely and utterly absent. Despite America having set beliefs for its country and a particular national pride, the country itself and its respective citizens are still individualistic more than anything else.

As for the government saying their citizens are completely free, well, it's obvious that that's just pure bullshit. So I agree with you there, and the notion of the government slowly taking away liberties by the use of fear.

So to return to your original statements; some Americans are atheists and are fighting against the government to change their laws accordingly; some are atheists who just don't give a shit; some believe in God and adhere to their government; and some believe in God and don't give a shit as to the implications this belief has with their government. And of course, there are more variations, I just listed a few.

Americans are not as generalized as you described them to be... And same goes for all western countries; individualism makes these considerations much more complex.
Учитавање...
Учитавање...
Tito, not all americans are atheists and not all americans believe god blesses america.

You made a massive statement from ignorance, and consequently, a conclusion from fallacy.
Учитавање...
Учитавање...
Well of course it's gonna die out. All things die out. But the reason why it will die is mostly likely gonna be because some other RP/UN type game will arise.
Учитавање...
Учитавање...
05.09.2014 у I miss UN
Написао Mr_Own_U, 01.05.2014 at 18:58

It's a map, people like it, get over it.
Учитавање...
Учитавање...
05.09.2014 у Clan quest
This brought tears to my eyes.

I don't think there's much we can do to solve this, but depend on individual players' courtesy, good judgement and so forth.

I agree with the idea that the captains of the respective clans, or whoever is highest in command amongst the selection of players currently online for a particular clan, should be the only ones discussing the settings.
Учитавање...
Учитавање...
02.09.2014 у Weakest Strategy 2014
IF, no competition.
Учитавање...
Учитавање...
Написао Acquiesce, 16.08.2014 at 20:04

Clovis are you doing hard drugs?
Учитавање...
Учитавање...
16.08.2014 у About moderators
Make a report if you were insulted or if someone disrespected you, or if someone disobeyed the rules.

You can't just take one particular instance where there was mod intervention, and one where there was not, and use that to justify mod favoritism.

And yes atwar is a dictatorship.

Locked.
Учитавање...
Учитавање...
05.08.2014 у Player Warning List
Lol agreed with adog.

also, imagine hdrakon, potlimitohama, terminal or eab's list of things they have done... how long it would be...
Учитавање...
Учитавање...
The trees are eating a salad with a side of mushroom soup, contemplating the apocalyptic plan the snails formulated 13 days in the future. Eat milk, drink bananas, and travel rapidly right into that rock behind the dumpster of destruction. Oh, and say hi to Tim for me.
Учитавање...
Учитавање...
Написао Permamuted, 23.07.2014 at 17:39

Написао Your Mother, 23.07.2014 at 15:45

2- Mauzer Panteri (troll+leaver)


agreed and support

xaxa

Написао tophat, 23.07.2014 at 16:53

This best in their respective primes.
5. Chess
10. Mauzer Panteri


poor chess and mauzer, no longer in their primes =/, its all downhill from here guys, soon youll be joining zizonists, aws unofficial retirement home


you misunderstood.

I mean't all these players, in ther primes, which primes were better.

Ironail was unbelievably better than everyone in his time, by quite a lot. That's what I mean.

Then again, the game is more competitive today, making it harder for guys like chess and mauzer's primes to surpass ironail's, for instance. So my list is biased. (same with everyone though)

These things cannot be determined, period.

Chess is best overall, mauzer second.
Учитавање...
Учитавање...
This best in their respective primes.

1. Ironail
2. Pinheiro
3. VRIL
4. Fruit
5. Chess
6. Aristosseur
7. philipho
8. Barrymore
9. SuperiorCacaoCow
10. Mauzer Panteri

(Me #3, lol jk)
Учитавање...
Учитавање...
180 attack vs 171 def

A normal battle you would lose by 2-3 units.


But he has way more units than you. That's a massive bonus for him.

>Normal battle 180att vs 171 def lose 2 units
>Add critical hits of every unit he had more than you. (45 ish or so inf, 27 more than you. that adds a lost of an extra 10 units, generally.
>Now you're at 12
> If he was IF then that would add another 10 units approximately.
>22
>Maybe he was particularly luckier than you. +5
>27 units

if he wasn't IF but pd instead, he was then +15 units luckier.

Also upgrades. Maybe he has more inf upgrades than you. etc..

In real life war, an army doesn't always lose as expected, or win as expected lol... sometimes there are blow outs... This is why there's a luck-roll factor in this game, to account for realism. Or else the game would be perfectly orchestrated all the time, lame.
Учитавање...
Учитавање...
16.07.2014 у AW has some problems.
Forgot about this thread. lol dear lord.

Waffel, you sound like a child begging for his ice cream.
Учитавање...
Учитавање...
05.07.2014 у PoTM June '14
I proposed mou and columna
Учитавање...
Учитавање...
05.07.2014 у I am the all mighty
Написао Goblin, 05.07.2014 at 10:52

Написао tophat, 05.07.2014 at 10:08

Faith in a deity is a result of childhood indoctrination, period lol.

"I just know that God exists, I have faith."
"How do you know?"
"I just know."
"No, actually, you don't. You think you know."


Funny thing is ...the same could be said to you too ..."you just know that god doesnt exist" ..."no you dont. You think you know"
Religious views are result of childhood OR adulthood indoctrination ...one doesnt only become religious when he is a child.
Faith in a deity or some greater meaning can be a different thing then religious view ...spiritualism can be separated from religion.
Religion is a mass fictional fantasy that is using human spiritualistic ability.
I said this before so many times ...religion or church being fiction is not a proof that some form of deity doesnt exist, this is a job for science.

First human being believing that sun is a god or that rain came from from gods was faith without indoctrination, he was wrong ...but he had faith and nobody forced that on him.


You're good at creating false premises of others' claims and formulating your arguments.

I never said that I know that God doesn't exist. So your intervention of that is fallacious.

Clearly, I am being ostentatious when I say, "Faith in a deity is a result of childhood indoctrination, period lol.". Obviously there are other factors such as adulthood indoctrination, and the example you gave of the first humans who had faith in Gods due to natural wonders. However, those people achieved this faith by asking questions, and subsequently answering those questions.

"Faith in a deity or some greater meaning can be a different thing then religious view ...spiritualism can be separated from religion."

Yes, of course, I didn't refute this. Why are you intervening with this exemplification?
Учитавање...
Учитавање...
05.07.2014 у I am the all mighty
Faith in a deity is a result of childhood indoctrination, period lol.

"I just know that God exists, I have faith."
"How do you know?"
"I just know."
"No, actually, you don't. You think you know."
Учитавање...
Учитавање...
03.07.2014 у I am the all mighty
Yes, and I as a believer, presuppose your existence. Therefore, all counter arguments attempting to disprove or even question your existence are irrelevant.

Here is the argument:

1) There are things that are true.
2) God exists.
3) Therefore, it is true that God exists.

End of story.
Учитавање...
Учитавање...
It's 2-1 plato. gg
Учитавање...
Учитавање...


Учитавање...
Учитавање...
atWar

About Us
Contact

приватност | Услови сервиса | Банери | Partners

Copyright © 2024 atWar. All rights reserved.

Придружи нам се на

Прошири гласине