|
Since when did pd have -1 att to bomber/destroyers, -2 crit to bomb/destroyers, -1 range destroyers, -2 range bombers.
Whose smartass idea was this.
Учитавање...
Учитавање...
|
|
Учитавање...
Учитавање...
|
|
So is anyone gonna give an answer to this? Was this some secret nerf added or what?
Учитавање...
Учитавање...
|
|
The bomber att nerf always existed. I never noticed the bomber range or destroyer based nerfs. Were they always there? They seem pretty arbitrary.
----
Учитавање...
Учитавање...
|
|
Since pd isnt sm or nc.
----
http://atwar-game.com/forum/topic.php?topic_id=14714&topicsearch=&page=
Учитавање...
Учитавање...
|
|
According to the atwar database page which prob hasn't been updated for several years, the pd stats haven't changed in that time.
----
Life has no limitations, except the ones you make.
--Les Brown
Учитавање...
Учитавање...
|
|
Написао Sascha, 28.09.2018 at 15:50
According to the atwar database page which prob hasn't been updated for several years, the pd stats haven't changed in that time.
Lao said that amok reverted to a backup to fix the bug where infantry and militia were deleted from the world map. It's possible that the bomber range nerf were removed for balance and then put back when amok went to the backup. Maybe if you put as much effort into teaching people ukr as arguing with me, you would be a mod by now.
Учитавање...
Учитавање...
|
|
Lao said that amok reverted to a backup to fix the bug where infantry and militia were deleted from the world map. It's possible that the bomber range nerf were removed for balance and then put back when amok went to the backup. Maybe if you put as much effort into teaching people ukr as arguing with me, you would be a mod by now.
sure, thats possible just showed you what I found I am not here to argue with you
----
Life has no limitations, except the ones you make.
--Les Brown
Учитавање...
Учитавање...
|
|
Since i was told 'make your own map' when i complained about outdated world map, i'll simply reply same to you: make your own units in editor, and your infantry will not have nerfs you complaining about.
----
If a game is around long enough, people will find the most efficient way to play it and start playing it like robots
Учитавање...
Учитавање...
|
|
Since i was told 'make your own map' when i complained about outdated world map, i'll simply reply same to you: make your own units in editor, and your infantry will not have nerfs you complaining about.
no infantry were nerfed. Learn to read.
Учитавање...
Учитавање...
|
|
Been playing pd more lately, it seems weaker somehow. Losing battles like 10/11 inf against 8 militia a couple times when i always had pd as the most consistent strategy is changing my perception of it.
Учитавање...
Учитавање...
|
|
Написао Sid, 29.09.2018 at 03:54
Been playing pd more lately, it seems weaker somehow. Losing battles like 10/11 inf against 8 militia a couple times when i always had pd as the most consistent strategy is changing my perception of it.
what
pd used to be 100% take if you sent +2
----
Учитавање...
Учитавање...
|
|
They ruin my strategymain i will have to go iron fist or great combinator
----
http://prntscr.com/omka79
http://prntscr.com/n1ymiv
Tacent quibbus Italia noverca est
Lirbur: therapy for england claims of superiority
Lirbur: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=WWyvoWzq3EM
Lirbur: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=_S8tP9wu2W0
Учитавање...
Учитавање...
|
|
Написао LukeTan, 29.09.2018 at 04:26
Написао Sid, 29.09.2018 at 03:54
Been playing pd more lately, it seems weaker somehow. Losing battles like 10/11 inf against 8 militia a couple times when i always had pd as the most consistent strategy is changing my perception of it.
what
pd used to be 100% take if you sent +2
ive never failed by sending only 9inf against 8 militia, but people tell me that wasnt supposed to be 100% either. maybe im lucky?
Учитавање...
Учитавање...
|
|
They ruin my strategymain i will have to go iron fist or great combinator
iron fist is more op anyways, u shud use it
Учитавање...
Учитавање...
|