Why is pride month so sexual?

Написао Crow, 14.06.2019 at 04:34

I wonder (((who))) is behind it.

Omg you are an Israeli. Antisemitism actively hurts you.

Написао Player 999, 15.06.2019 at 21:04

Написао Crow, 14.06.2019 at 04:34

I wonder (((who))) is behind it.

Omg you are an Israeli. Antisemitism actively hurts you.

I'm not a Jew, and it's not anti semetic to be against zionism or the state of Israel.

Написао Crow, 16.06.2019 at 03:51

I'm not a Jew, and it's not anti semetic to be against zionism or the state of Israel.

We're not talking about that. I know what the "((()))" means. It's a dog whistle against judaism.

Написао Player 999, 16.06.2019 at 14:08

Написао Crow, 16.06.2019 at 03:51

I'm not a Jew, and it's not anti semetic to be against zionism or the state of Israel.

We're not talking about that. I know what the "((()))" means. It's a dog whistle against judaism.

Not against Judaism, but Zionism.

Написао Crow, 16.06.2019 at 14:32

Написао Player 999, 16.06.2019 at 14:08

Написао Crow, 16.06.2019 at 03:51

I'm not a Jew, and it's not anti semetic to be against zionism or the state of Israel.

We're not talking about that. I know what the "((()))" means. It's a dog whistle against judaism.

Not against Judaism, but Zionism.

Idk if you're optics cucking or actually this new. The echoes are anti-semetic in origin, started by the Daily Shoah's thing with echoeing jewish names.

Написао QuasiCasual, 16.06.2019 at 15:45

Написао Crow, 16.06.2019 at 14:32

Написао Player 999, 16.06.2019 at 14:08

Написао Crow, 16.06.2019 at 03:51

I'm not a Jew, and it's not anti semetic to be against zionism or the state of Israel.

We're not talking about that. I know what the "((()))" means. It's a dog whistle against judaism.

Not against Judaism, but Zionism.

Idk if you're optics cucking or actually this new. The echoes are anti-semetic in origin, started by the Daily Shoah's thing with echoeing jewish names.

Okay, so? Am I not allowed to talk about God's chosen people or something? People can be racist against blacks and muslims at will, but the line is drawn at anti-semitism?

Написао Crow, 16.06.2019 at 17:07

Okay, so? Am I not allowed to talk about God's chosen people or something? People can be racist against blacks and muslims at will, but the line is drawn at anti-semitism?

People are against racism you goof. Who said racism against blacks/muslims is ok, besides trolls on this? What even is your argument

Написао Crow, 16.06.2019 at 17:07

Написао QuasiCasual, 16.06.2019 at 15:45

Написао Crow, 16.06.2019 at 14:32

Написао Player 999, 16.06.2019 at 14:08

Написао Crow, 16.06.2019 at 03:51

I'm not a Jew, and it's not anti semetic to be against zionism or the state of Israel.

We're not talking about that. I know what the "((()))" means. It's a dog whistle against judaism.

Not against Judaism, but Zionism.

Idk if you're optics cucking or actually this new. The echoes are anti-semetic in origin, started by the Daily Shoah's thing with echoeing jewish names.

Okay, so? Am I not allowed to talk about God's chosen people or something? People can be racist against blacks and muslims at will, but the line is drawn at anti-semitism?

I didn't imply any of that, sheesh. I'm just saying that the origin of the echoes is indeed anti-semetic. What sort of person uses this term ''optics cucking''?
EDIT: REEEEEE Christians are God's Chosen People not the bloody jews. I hate evangelicalism so much for spreading this dumb idea

Написао QuasiCasual, 17.06.2019 at 02:45

EDIT: REEEEEE Christians are God's Chosen People not the bloody jews. I hate evangelicalism so much for spreading this dumb idea

So 1 billion Chinese will not go to Heaven? Is there Heaven anyway? If yes, why is Earth created then?

Написао Skanderbeg, 17.06.2019 at 17:57

Написао QuasiCasual, 17.06.2019 at 02:45

EDIT: REEEEEE Christians are God's Chosen People not the bloody jews. I hate evangelicalism so much for spreading this dumb idea

So 1 billion Chinese will not go to Heaven? Is there Heaven anyway? If yes, why is Earth created then?

every religion gives a diffrent explanation

Написао Skanderbeg, 17.06.2019 at 17:57

Написао QuasiCasual, 17.06.2019 at 02:45

EDIT: REEEEEE Christians are God's Chosen People not the bloody jews. I hate evangelicalism so much for spreading this dumb idea

So 1 billion Chinese will not go to Heaven? Is there Heaven anyway? If yes, why is Earth created then?

Are you implying that I implied any of this? I do not know whether the Chinese will go to Heaven. It is not my call, it is not my judgement. Perhaps God will take mercy for their ignorance, perhaps they are condemning themselves due to low agency, but that is all speculation.

''Heaven'' as in the realm where the bodiless powers (angels) and God ''reside'' is not the Heaven we will enter. The New Eden will be on this world, and whether it is Heaven or Hell depends on your relationship with God. A good relationship will mean experiencing God's grace/energy (not energy as in physics) as something pleasant, perhaps warmth and an indescribable peace. A bad relationship would mean experiencing fire within God's Presence. Earth was created out of God's love, a strictly free act that wasn't required of God to do yet He still did it so that we may be like Him.

Why is a month that celebrates irregular sexuality identity so sexual? The answer is in the question ya doofus

Написао Acquiesce, 18.06.2019 at 22:03

Why is a month that celebrates irregular sexuality identity so sexual? The answer is in the question ya doofus

seeing u here on forums is arousing

Написао Acquiesce, 18.06.2019 at 22:03

Why is a month that celebrates irregular sexuality identity so sexual? The answer is in the question ya doofus

But what about "It's about love". not this "Yeah I fuck people everywhere"
Why let kids dance like stripers in front of random people on the street?

And. If you do think it's about ott sexuality, then let's celebrate "Straight pride month". I mean if its not about how the Lgbt people have been treated over the years and how now they are getting a voice.

Well damn, I guess it is all about the sex...

Написао PleaseMe, 12.06.2019 at 15:57

Can you stop making useless threads. You must live in the middle of fuckheadistan because all you do is question women, religion, and gay rights. Piss off already.

Написао Sid, 13.06.2019 at 01:04

This is actually a really good question that i wonder myself. If i had to guess i would assume it comes from frustration of being in a male-female centric society where it's normal to have those relationships publicly (tv / movies specifically) and gay relationships are somewhat shunned in public still.

Написао Noir Brillant, 13.06.2019 at 22:29

As for the original question, yeah, I agree that the LGBT is too sexualized. But I think Sid found a good explanation: past oppression. It's like where I live.

This just isn't true. If this were the case then the open debauchery would be committed by both sexes. I see a lot of the conversation revolving around culture and morality - which is necessary - but it doesn't focus on the core reason: Biological reality. All the debauchery at pride parades is almost exclusively committed by homosexual men. The drag scene is also entirely dominated by homosexual men. There are outliers of 'Drag Kings' and the occasional feminist lesbian with her saggy tits flopping around but the entire public debauchery scene at pride is all committed by homosexual men. Gay scenes with large orgies and 'pozz spreading' (the sub-culture of purposely spreading and receiving HIV) is exclusively male. This has nothing to do with ostracisation or lack of expression, and has everything to do with male sexuality. Men have much higher sex drives with stronger primal urges compared to women. The differences in violent and sexual crimes of the sexes show this. We also know that when sex and promiscuity aren't limited or shamed, the cultural dissemination of 'fetishes' increases exponentially. When a person is exposed to a kink, it is fresh and exotic, but overtime it loses its lustre leading a person down a deeper rabbit hole of more deviant preferences. Studies I have read show that a very large portion of those who identify as homosexual suffered abuse as a child. People who suffer such abuses are more likely to engage in more harmful and deviant sexual lifestyle choices.

Men are highly sexual and primal-driven creatures. It's far easier to give in to our impulses than to deny them. The coupling of a man and a woman brings balance. Their differences in drives tends to lead to compromise. Competition is more scarce, especially in a society that shames promiscuous behaviour and adultery which is more common among hetero's. Within the male homosexual community; promiscuity, adultery and sexual tolerance is widely celebrated and proliferated. There is little drive toward monogamy. Competition is EXTREMELY high within homosexual circles and the fluidity of male sexual drives allows for far more expression with very little shaming. Female homosexuals tend to be more monogamous, there is less competition which has led to a surprising difference in the male and female homosexuals: Gay men are physically fitter on average compared to hetero men while gay women are far more likely to be overweight or obese compared to hetero women. Do you ever hear of 'Lesbian' orgies? They happen but they are extremely rare. There are more male gay bars than female ones and the atmospheres are very different. Male gay bars tend to be out and out fluorescent full-on debauchery with dicks out and open sex, spilling into the street. Female gay bars are more reserved and more about finding a romantic partner. You'll be hard pressed to find images of lesbian clubs that aren't clearly just pornographic images for male pleasure. Lesbians also have the highest levels of domestic violence per capita. This could be due to high cases of childhood abuse among gay women which leads to expressions of rage at a later age, but other reasons may be possible.

In conclusion, the male gay scene is populated by a much higher variant of people who were abused as children and have a far higher likelihood of mental illness coupled with the male sexual drive, an innate desire to compete, heavy testosterone and the rabbit hole of sexual perversions within a closed environment of sexual tolerance which leads to a very warped debauched communal mindset. This debauchery increases with time DESPITE growths in acceptance. In fact, it gets worse the more it is promoted and tolerated. The opposite of your statement is true. The same is true for heterosexual promiscuity. The more it is promoted and tolerated, the worse it gets.

Promiscuity should be shamed. It is dangerous and extremely harmful to a society.

Написао Sid, 13.06.2019 at 01:04

Personally I still get really uncomfortable seeing 2 dudes going at it, but if you shove it in my face enough, i'll probably be more tolerant/ less weirded out in the future.

Proving the point of the deviant rabbit hole. The more you see it, the more tame it becomes allowing for acceptance of even more dangerous and deviant lifestyles. The slippery slope is real and we can see that with the acceptance of underage drag queen strippers in the gay community, such as 'Desmond is Amazing'. There are other examples of this trend.

Написао Sid, 13.06.2019 at 01:04

For a good example of gay shunning, look at Legend of Korra when she was kind of gay for a bit at the end. People went crazy over it for some reason.

In the modern realm where there are no rites of passage and little spiritual meaning in peoples lives; immersion within a distracting illusion can be extremely important to many. Anything which breaks the immersion is despised. Sudden random gayness within a character ruins their immersion and the reaction can get quite volatile. Personally, I'd prefer it if people were morally outraged at deviant behaviours in their entertainment but it's far more likely that the writers broke their immersion bubble.

- - - -

Написао Noir Brillant, 13.06.2019 at 22:29

Man, I wish some of you guys would "live and let live" a little bit more

Live and let live is the absolute bane of our current societal predicament. This atomised individualism has led to the worst cases of apathy in our nations existence. We are not equipped or capable of making perfect decisions. In fact, we are far more inclined to give in to impulses which have serious harmful consequences. People who make poor choices are commonplace and damaging to themselves and everyone around them. Your actions and choices have vast consequences. Bad choices should be curtailed, not tolerated.

Написао Noir Brillant, 13.06.2019 at 22:29

I "philosophically" disagree with people claiming that something is (im)moral. They start with an observation, and then conclude with something that MUST be, or that we MUST or MUST NOT do.

This is nihilism. We know there are objective moralities which benefit a society and those that don't. This is the basis of morality.

Написао Noir Brillant, 13.06.2019 at 22:29

Like: "Seeing two guys kissing makes people sick", therefore it must be wrong.

Mostly true.

Написао Noir Brillant, 13.06.2019 at 22:29

Or: "Human race would not survive if men were gay", therefore, it must be wrong.

Correct.

Написао Noir Brillant, 13.06.2019 at 22:29

Or: "Random dudes wrote a book about another dude claiming to be the son of a god", therefore we must follow what is written in the book.

And adherence to that book led to great success. It's almost as if Ancient societies had a great understanding of the human condition and adapted laws for the greater good. If it were up to you and your nihilism, you wouldn't care if half the population suddenly decided to kill themselves.

Написао Noir Brillant, 13.06.2019 at 22:29

In other words, all those claims about morality are purely an opinion (in my opinion).

Everything is an opinion. That doesn't mean it isn't based within a lived reality. Any argument that starts with claiming everything is a social construct is void. It's a faulty starting premise with no meaning.

Написао Noir Brillant, 13.06.2019 at 22:29

LONG LIVE the LGBT community.

It will not live long at all. All trends show an inevitable crushing of this mindset regardless of which philosophy conquers the corpse of Liberalism. Marxist, Fascist, Nationalist, Islamist, Monarchist, Theocratic etc. They always abolish it when the decadent system fails. The prevalence of promiscuity always occurs in the final stages of a civilisations lifespan. It's the herald of its 'End'.