Учитавање...
Учитавање...
|
|
Учитавање...
Учитавање...
|
|
Учитавање...
Учитавање...
|
|
10.05.2014 - 10:17
+10 cost to every other unit. Or this will be too OP.
---- "Riddle me this, Riddle me that...?" - The Riddler
Учитавање...
Учитавање...
|
|
10.05.2014 - 11:23
I guess there is no loss on it. It looks like an upgrade more than a strategy.
----
Учитавање...
Учитавање...
|
|
10.05.2014 - 11:43
Seems like Blitzkrieg that's transport orientated. Interesting at first sight but; No go.
Учитавање...
Учитавање...
|
|
13.05.2014 - 00:06
Needs some downsides. How about all your non-transport units have 1 less range? However, it makes your submarines better as well, and along with +capacity and -cost, the three transport units get extra range. (3 extra range for ATs, STs, and subs, and subs also recieve -80 cost and +2 capacity) I'm probably derailing the suggestion too much and overcomplicating it, but I think that'd be pretty fun; it'd require skill, too. If you're shit with transports, it's not very helpful, but good use of transports would make it very powerful.
Учитавање...
Учитавање...
|
|
13.05.2014 - 00:06
Учитавање...
Учитавање...
|
|
13.05.2014 - 04:55
no, it's not op, capacity won't conquer the world. 50k games, Hw can beat this strategy.
---- Hi
Учитавање...
Учитавање...
|
|
13.05.2014 - 04:56
no its not op, transportation can't conquer the world only sea transport
---- Hi
Учитавање...
Учитавање...
|
|
13.05.2014 - 04:56
Support, Great strategy for Alex mauzer
---- Hi
Учитавање...
Учитавање...
|
|
13.05.2014 - 06:12
This needs some seriously big downsides, otherwise it will be too OP. It seems like Blitz and Imp combined for transports only, to be honest. This strategy would be good if both defensive and offensive units get weakened when playing with it. But, I don't know... Not really supporting, this strategy just... I don't know, it don't feel like we need such a strat.
Учитавање...
Учитавање...
|
|
Учитавање...
Учитавање...
|
|
13.05.2014 - 09:40
Do you realize that the air transports in this strategy would have 8 capacity for 400 cost. How is this not OP? This would give me better air transports than sky menace, and, in turn, the ability to move at the speed of blitz with no nerfs to the other troops. The "none" strategy would never be used again because all this strategy does is boost. It needs nerfs.
---- "Riddle me this, Riddle me that...?" - The Riddler
Учитавање...
Учитавање...
|
|
cascaval Профил је обрисан |
13.05.2014 - 10:55 cascaval Профил је обрисан
How about nerf to infantry and tank range?
Учитавање...
Учитавање...
|
13.05.2014 - 12:56
SM has 6 capacity for 350 + 2 range + 2 critical + 1 attack + 1 defense. And SM only downfall is tanks (replaced by bombers) and I think -1 attack infantry.
Учитавање...
Учитавање...
|
|
13.05.2014 - 14:20
what strategy cannot beat this strategy. it just give you extra range no boost in attack or view range
---- Hi
Учитавање...
Учитавање...
|
|
13.05.2014 - 14:21
HW is overnerf unless its a 50k games
---- Hi
Учитавање...
Учитавање...
|
|
13.05.2014 - 14:23
it defeat the purpose, how about -1 view range of all troop except sea tran.,air tran, submarine.
---- Hi
Учитавање...
Учитавање...
|
|
13.05.2014 - 14:30
Any strategy can beat any strategy. So, your argument is invalid. The point of a strategy is to have some boosts and some nerfs. This strategy would have very strong boosts, and no downsides.
As Goblin said: View range nerf? :/
---- "Riddle me this, Riddle me that...?" - The Riddler
Учитавање...
Учитавање...
|
|
13.05.2014 - 14:34
I think the nerf should not be range orientated because this would defeat the purpose of the title of the strat. Instead I think the nerf should be to cut the hp of everything except inf, tanks, trans and airtrans by 1. This reduces the power of milita (increasing the need to to get the right units to the right place) and makes the strat dependent on things transported.
----
Учитавање...
Учитавање...
|
|
13.05.2014 - 14:57
How about +10 (more would be better) cost to all ground main and stealth attack units?
Учитавање...
Учитавање...
|
|
Учитавање...
Учитавање...
|
|
13.05.2014 - 16:02
This strat is more OP than it seems, just think about it. Tanks should be nerfed a lot, as well as the units' cost. Stealth units should be nerfed as well, because someone would be just able to move his air trans in the enemy's land and just spread his marines across it.
Учитавање...
Учитавање...
|
|
13.05.2014 - 16:52
I think with just militia. So many people keep saying its OP. OP compared to what? None? The inf is not as powerful as PD, and everything else is not as powerful as other strat. Only thing it does is just give you more mobility. The range hasn't change. Nerfing everything to kingdom come because of "maybe" situations has created failed strats like HW. I say just stick with nerf on militia and see how it plays out
Учитавање...
Учитавање...
|
|
13.05.2014 - 17:38
I say -1 range on all units + -2 attack on militia
---- It's not the end.
Учитавање...
Учитавање...
|
|
13.05.2014 - 19:32
Support, at least its better than HW, I need a new strategy to shake/shed/use/rid of this sp menance
---- Hi
Учитавање...
Учитавање...
|
Да ли си сигуран?