Why America/Europe still didn't invade Russia?

When Serbia captured Kosovo:





When Russia captured Crimea:

Tbh Crimea has more of a right belonging to Russia anyway

NATO only fights against those nations it knows it can win against. All others they throw their hands in the air, sing Kumbaya and lay sanctions.
If they went against Russia they'd have China to deal with too (as a non-combatant probably but significant economic aid)

Regardless of what nato has done in the past, ukr is not part of nato so they are not required to counterattack.

I'd rather not have a nuclear apocalypse kthx

Oh but Godfather... the scenario did happen. Only this time the role of USA is taken by Russia and this time Yugoslavia is Ukraine.

Why dont you support Ukraine as you supported Yugoslavia?

The US couldnt beat Vietnam with Napalm Bombs and aircraft carriers, modern jets , choppers , tanks vs a bunch of guerrilla soldiers .... vs Russia it'd be over in 5 days

I like how retarded right wingers and Russia/China bots spread propaganda all over the internet, intention to put distrust into western governments.

Do you want to know why is Kosovo right and Crimea not ?

Because Ukrainians didn't tried to physicly destroy russians on crimea, they didn't took their autonomy from them, that is why.

Написао Black Swans, 23.08.2016 at 06:38

I like how retarded right wingers and Russia/China bots spread propaganda all over the internet, intention to put distrust into western governments.

Do you want to know why is Kosovo right and Crimea not ?

Because Ukrainians didn't tried to physicly destroy russians on crimea, they didn't took their autonomy from them, that is why.

Actually they did take their autonomy from them, the new Ukrainian goverment discontinued the Russian language's official status in Ukraine

Like it or not tito is right here, NATO had no right to interfere in kosovo and albanian uprising.

People that think Russia is strong make me laugh.

We don't invade because its fucking useless.

If it didn't have nukes it wouldn't be any more significant than Brazil.

That's your only trump card... Nukes.

Edit: Ruskis cant even compete in the Olympics without relying on drugs to compete... Fight us without nukes I fucking dare you

Написао Phoenix, 23.08.2016 at 07:07

People that think Russia is strong make me laugh.

We don't invade because its fucking useless.

If it didn't have nukes it wouldn't be any more significant than Brazil.

That's your only trump card... Nukes.

Edit: Ruskis cant even compete in the Olympics without relying on drugs to compete... Fight us without nukes I fucking dare you

I thought you were a treehugger who loved everyone, whats with all this hate to ruskies now? Hypocrit much?

Actually Russia has quite a bit of oil and minerals. It only can't exploit them very well because of low population density, and the Siberian cold

I have a question for you tito, why didnt russia defend serbia when Nato was bombing them? Why didnt russia send threats to Nato to stop bombing serbia? Why didnt russia interviene in kosovo by serbian side like theyre doing today in syria killing civilians?

Написао Darth., 23.08.2016 at 07:18

Actually Russia has quite a bit of oil and minerals. It only can't exploit them very well because of low population density, and the Siberian cold

I know how much oil it has. It produces more gas. Still a fucking giant waste of space. Just a nuisance if anything... And there are people here suggesting the "west" is scared of it. If Russia is so big and powerful why doesn't it take back the Baltic states? Russia is the one that has to play safe.

Написао Viruslegion, 22.08.2016 at 21:35

Tbh Crimea has more of a right belonging to Russia anyway

Don't ruin it now... Support American invasion of Russia!

Написао Witch-Doctor, 22.08.2016 at 23:31

Regardless of what nato has done in the past, ukr is not part of nato so they are not required to counterattack.

And Kosovo was NATO so NATO had to intervene?

Написао Goblin, 23.08.2016 at 00:59

Oh but Godfather... the scenario did happen. Only this time the role of USA is taken by Russia and this time Yugoslavia is Ukraine.

Why dont you support Ukraine as you supported Yugoslavia?

Last time when Yugoslavia had rebels, NATO supported rebels, now Ukraine have rebels and NATO support the government

Sounds like changing international rules to suits selfish interest to me

Написао Black Swans, 23.08.2016 at 06:38

I like how retarded right wingers and Russia/China bots spread propaganda all over the internet, intention to put distrust into western governments.

Do you want to know why is Kosovo right and Crimea not ?

Because Ukrainians didn't tried to physicly destroy russians on crimea, they didn't took their autonomy from them, that is why.

Only created state-owned website to hunt down western and eastern journalists reporting truth in the Donbass, removing equality from Ukrainian constitution and killing non-Ukrainian civilians. Sounds like nazism to me. Which is not impossible since they already were nazis 70 years ago and crucified 100,000 Poles on their barns.

Написао Evic, 23.08.2016 at 06:51

Like it or not tito is right here, NATO had no right to interfere in kosovo and albanian uprising.

Does any country or alliance have right to intervene in other countrys domestic affairs?

Написао Skanderbeg, 23.08.2016 at 08:20

Sounds like changing international rules to suits selfish interest to me

You know that sound mate, because you played that music since i meet you.

Написао Phoenix, 23.08.2016 at 07:07

People that think Russia is strong make me laugh.

Its weak, invade please, you will win.

Написао Phoenix, 23.08.2016 at 07:07

We don't invade because its fucking useless.

That's not what Madleine Albright, Zbigniew Brzezinski, Wolfowitz, Truman, Kennedy, Bush, Hillary Clinton says

They all created a plan to split Russia into republics and drain $70 trillion worth resources long ago, or do you know better than your Western leaders?

Didn't you read Mackinder Theory? Russia = Heartland; whoever rule the hearthland - rule the world? Maybe they plan to exploit Russian resources and rule the world?

Написао Phoenix, 23.08.2016 at 07:07

If it didn't have nukes it wouldn't be any more significant than Brazil.

True, no oil, gas, timber, food. Nothing to attract German car makes, Swedish furniture companies, American oil companies and Chinese food sellers.

Oh wait we have all that and they are already here doing business

Написао Phoenix, 23.08.2016 at 07:07

That's your only trump card... Nukes.

Nope, wrong. our ace is water, food and timber.

25% of planetary drinking water, 33% of planetary forests and 10% of planetary food-production land.


Whoever have the money, control the governments, but whoever own food and water control the people.


Keep rising your populations 50 million a year, we balanced ours

Написао Phoenix, 23.08.2016 at 07:07

Edit: Ruskis cant even compete in the Olympics without relying on drugs to compete...

Meldonium? Substance allowed by World Sport Federation for decades but then got proposal by America to remove it and then - oh the surprise - American media publish how Russia cheat?

Give me a break, even Sporting Federation said they are considering to remove meldonium, but did nothing yet and Americans just report what they want, Russia is not guilty of cheating. Sport Federation already reported that meldonium is heart-protecting substance, not capability-enhancing.

Get your facts straight and stop believing media all they they tell you. That is very childish.

Написао Phoenix, 23.08.2016 at 07:07

Fight us without nukes I fucking dare you

Like Russia fought in Warsaw in 1792?
Or Paris in 1814?
Or Berlin 1945?

Do you want London 2016?

Why you don't learn history and try not to make same mistakes?

Написао Skanderbeg, 23.08.2016 at 08:37

Like Russia fought in Warsaw in 1792?
Or Paris in 1814?
Or Berlin 1945?

Do you want London 2016?

Why you don't learn history and try not to make same mistakes?

I know more about History than you, child.

You managed to forget how for the first 3 years of WW2 Stalin cried to Churchill to send twice the armed forces we had to distract the Nazis because the high quantity, low quality red army couldn't handle the German advances.

You just turned around and made out like providing timber, water and "heart land" makes you strong... please, you're Europe's plumber...

Написао Phoenix, 23.08.2016 at 09:11

I know more about History than you, child.

I doubt that, plus i am probably 2x older than you but 2x younger in mind and spirit.

Написао Phoenix, 23.08.2016 at 09:11

You managed to forget how for the first 3 years of WW2 Stalin cried to Churchill to send twice the armed forces we had to distract the Nazis

That's true, because 5 million Americans landed in Britain who OPENLY said they are willing to fight the Nazis and end this war as soon as possible so they can return home. They said that in 1942 and their leadership let them wait for 2 years to help USSR in 1944 when Red Army already reached Berlin and 80% of German Army was already destroyed.

Good going.

Написао Phoenix, 23.08.2016 at 09:11

because the high quantity, low quality red army couldn't handle the German advances.

Germans are stopped at Moscow on December 7th 1941... They could not conquer USSR further than that anymore... Long before Allies helpd USSR.

Even nazis admit that Soviet equipment was on par with theirs, some equipment even superior at start or end of war. Your propaganda fails there boy.

What other country had tanks with slopped armor and 85mm gun in that time? Or rocket launchers like katyusha? I don't think so you'll know.

Why can't you accept that you are not the best on the world and there are other innovative nations? Why you have to shit on everyone else? Where is that complex coming from? Trauma, illness or weakness?

Why is it wrong to ask for help when fighting evil and you make mockery of it?

Написао Phoenix, 23.08.2016 at 09:11

You just turned around and made out like providing timber, water and "heart land" makes you strong... please, you're Europe's plumber...

Water for drinking and irrigation, timber for construction and food for consumtion are basic needs for all nations but Russia owns the most of it. Oil and gas will run out in 100 years, and deserts cannot be destroyed.

And what you do, instead doing business and trade you sanction and tell lies. I dare you to find Russian media drawings of Western leaders as evil, with blood, with some extremist quote.

Russia won't go down to this level...

Написао Phoenix, 23.08.2016 at 09:11

please, you're Europe's plumber...

Poles are known as European plumbers by Europeans... but any normal job is honorable if its worked properly. Something you can't understand and can't find out as you learned only to steal and plunder. Like you did from India, Americas, Africa and now trying from Russia.

Написао Phoenix, 23.08.2016 at 09:11

Написао Skanderbeg, 23.08.2016 at 08:37

Like Russia fought in Warsaw in 1792?
Or Paris in 1814?
Or Berlin 1945?

Do you want London 2016?

Why you don't learn history and try not to make same mistakes?

I know more about History than you, child.

You managed to forget how for the first 3 years of WW2 Stalin cried to Churchill to send twice the armed forces we had to distract the Nazis because the high quantity, low quality red army couldn't handle the German advances.

You just turned around and made out like providing timber, water and "heart land" makes you strong... please, you're Europe's plumber...

Pho,he forgot about lend-lease

Написао Skanderbeg, 23.08.2016 at 09:50

Even nazis admit that Soviet equipment was on par with theirs, some equipment even superior at start or end of war. Your propaganda fails there boy.

I'm not sure if you realise, but here in the decadent west we have free media... different sources produce different views, we even have Russia today... we can watch and think what we want.... if you think THAT is propaganda, you're fucking deluded...

This moment,when you are supposed to hear,why NATO ''attack only''weak countries,but the haters didnt know,what Russia is occupying a land of another country

For example,Russo-Georgian War,20% of Georgia was taken by russian agressor

Написао EpiC LegenD, 23.08.2016 at 10:07

For example,Russo-Georgian War,20% of Georgia was taken by russian agressor

Except the regions taken were inhabited by non-Georgian, pro-Russian people who desired independence.

Написао Zephyrusu, 23.08.2016 at 10:24

Написао EpiC LegenD, 23.08.2016 at 10:07

For example,Russo-Georgian War,20% of Georgia was taken by russian agressor

Except the regions taken were inhabited by non-Georgian, pro-Russian people who desired independence.

USSR made this shit to all countries in the union,only in Baltics it failed