Disinformation meets Information

A discussion on any questions or doubts you may have, and I'll Enlighten

Why am I so amazing?

Read a book

You are the reason god left us.

Hello so here is what i think:Races are diffrent in some aspects but we all share a common species some races are smarter stronger more fit for survival in a specific area the others but at the end we are all humans we shouldnt regard another race as inferior or superior there are isnt race which should be regardd as stronger in all the fields
An example for this is in sports
-Blacks useully dominate in the running and jumping competitions while asians dominate in shoting commpetiotions whites are good at skiing but that doesnt mean that a white or asian person cant run fast, a black cant skii
-

Race is a social construct. There are physical differences between groups of people and differences in skin colour but ultimately there is no other difference.

Написао Phin, 03.09.2016 at 15:16

Why am I so amazing?

You are not, It is a perception given to your self as other Humans can reach, rival or surpass any qualities you believe are above everyone else

But himmel, I am better than everybody

What is the definite integral from 0 to pi of e^x^2 and how would I take the Laplace transform of the same equation if dy/dx = e^x^2

Написао Cheesus_Crust, 03.09.2016 at 15:18

I believe a black person can become a mathematical genius or a musical one. if he is raised in different conditions ( even in the same conditions)
plz enlighten

http://www.nytimes.com/1986/12/02/science/major-personality-study-finds-that-traits-are-mostly-inherited.html

Написао Enosia, 03.09.2016 at 15:20

Race is a social construct. There are physical differences between groups of people and differences in skin colour but ultimately there is no other difference.

Always heard things about black people frequently having more fast twitch muscle fibers, never saw anything official about it, can you enlighten me Himmelreich

(this is for Himmel, just quoted because it was relevant)

Написао Enosia, 03.09.2016 at 15:20

Race is a social construct. There are physical differences between groups of people and differences in skin colour but ultimately there is no other difference.

All dogs are equal!!! Police officers should use chihuahuas as police dogs!!!

Написао Cheesus_Crust, 03.09.2016 at 15:30

The need to achieve, including ambition and an inclination to work hard toward goals, also was found to be genetically influenced, but more than half of this trait seemed determined by life experience. The same lower degree of hereditary influence was found for impulsiveness and its opposite, caution.
http://www.nytimes.com/1986/12/02/science/major-personality-study-finds-that-traits-are-mostly-inherited.html

Nearly 50% of your personality is influenced by genes, is that not significant enough? and curiously this one is up:

Among traits found most strongly determined by heredity were leadership and, surprisingly, traditionalism or obedience to authority.

If i was a government, i would love to have more people with obedience to authority and less people with lack of it.

Написао Cheesus_Crust, 03.09.2016 at 15:18

I believe a black person can become a mathematical genius or a musical one. if he is raised in different conditions ( even in the same conditions)
plz enlighten

Mathematics is a Highly Logical Aspect of nature. Human Minds aren't Particularly designed for Logic. Human Driven aspects of society such as social acceptance makes the possibility that being "good" at math is not something that people take with pride. Rational Thinking is something that must be intrinsically driven, as many Humans are not logical, Much of Human civilization does not derive from logical thinking as many Humans survive just fine without it. Now Looking at Genetics in a generalist view can be used. As Genes are passed down, and with the factor that 95% of Humans have a chance to breed. Genes of which can be considered a detriment to advanced mental capacities, are passed down or Genes which can foster Extreme intellectualism can be diluted out of a particular strain of genetic line, to which the benefit no longer appears in the organisms offspring. Taking into consideration the genetic aspects of Sub-Saharan, or Mixed Blacks reveal that The number of Neurons within the differing Cranial Structures and the Differing Hormonal Influences and Brain Structuralism shows that Especially in Language the Black have difficulties. Now you are correct to say that a being can be conditioned to retain information, however there is a limit to the capacity in which the information and be stored and expressed. The IQ for a 25% Bred Black with White in america is from 80-85. The IQ of Sub-Saharan is around 70 and below. Now with these constraints and considering possible IQ deviation, Some Mixed Blacks can reach a level to which Mathematical Fluency is possible, however no Mixed Black can reach the Level of a IQ deviation that is possible with Europeans or Asians, to which if the deviation is Equal, the Whites and Asians will be considered more of a "genius" that the Mixed Black. Pure African Genetics do not Provide the necessary Probability that a intellectual Deviation will reach that of "Genius" capacity, as what is now Modern Standards of Intellect, developed in EU and East Asia, were not developed nor found necessary in the gene pool of Africans, as the Environment created a separate being fitted to their environment through Natural selection. A Pure Black, or Mixed Black, Can be Conditioned under A higher Civilization, yet the limitations still apply, Behavioral aspects of aggression and boredom with Intellectualism can lead to a failed attempt of Conditioning. Now If the conditioning succeeds then the comparison of the Black to the White or Asian Equivalent will be outperformed. It doesn't mean that Improvement is not possible but due to genetic and instilled behaviors, along with the possible social interactions that limit Intellectual growth, all make it unlikely for a Black Mathematical "Genius". And while Improvements can be made on the Very rare Blacks or Half Bred Blacks can be made to grow in mental function it cannot rival the Genetic Potential that the Europeans and Asian can achieve. Conditions can only pave a route to Improvement, Not guarantee it.

Написао Tundy, 03.09.2016 at 15:35

Написао Enosia, 03.09.2016 at 15:20

Race is a social construct. There are physical differences between groups of people and differences in skin colour but ultimately there is no other difference.

All dogs are equal!!! Police officers should use chihuahuas as police dogs!!!

the equality within dogs can be chased in their mind not in their size a chiuhuahuas can be as aggressive as a bulldog !! dont you think ? but the size thou~

Написао Brsjak, 03.09.2016 at 15:19

Hello so here is what i think:Races are diffrent in some aspects but we all share a common species some races are smarter stronger more fit for survival in a specific area the others but at the end we are all humans we shouldnt regard another race as inferior or superior there are isnt race which should be regardd as stronger in all the fields
An example for this is in sports
-Blacks useully dominate in the running and jumping competitions while asians dominate in shoting commpetiotions whites are good at skiing but that doesnt mean that a white or asian person cant run fast, a black cant skii
-

Написао Enosia, 03.09.2016 at 15:20

Race is a social construct. There are physical differences between groups of people and differences in skin colour but ultimately there is no other difference.

The Differing Sub-species (Races) are Extremely Different and do not Share, if remaining Pure as distinct genetic line: Cranial structures, Facial Structures, Body Type, Mental capacity, Hormonal influxes, Behaviors, or Physical Attributes/ Potential. We are All Similar but the unique Variations between the Human Species are something to be cherished if we actually thought in a global sense rather than individualist Thought processes. No Race is Superior in all respects than another, However this does not mean, that there are more than one aspect of a race that cannot be performed or achieved by the other. Hence they may be "Superior in only 4/6 Categories but not all. This is the result of natural selection to Which Blacks are efficient in Sprinting and Jumping Capacity due to the differences in Muscles and body type, While Whites and Asian Dominate in Strength and muscle control, along with Swimming and Flexibility like that found in gymnastics. There are differences in Diseases among the races, the way they react to medicine, There are Hormonal differences, and even in Brain Structure and Physiology and Behavior Patterns. All Proven. Behaviors are only slightly affected by environment, Genetics are the main factor than Environment. As experiments with Twins show that even different environments bare the same result. While the identical twins are not 100% Similar they share a vast amount of similarities than differences.

Написао Cheesus_Crust, 03.09.2016 at 15:22

Human nature refers to the distinguishing characteristics—including ways of thinking, feeling, and acting—which humans tend to have naturally, independently of the influence of culture - religion - society - family - physicality or mentality
on this ground how can we generalize some behaviour of; as discussed "black" people ?

Genetic Aspects are the Reason for that result, as Environment only plays minimal roles.

Написао Witch-Doctor, 03.09.2016 at 15:24

What is the definite integral from 0 to pi of e^x^2 and how would I take the Laplace transform of the same equation if dy/dx = e^x^2

e^(x^2) doesn't have a true integral Unless express the integral of the function in terms of erf

However Using integrating factor method e^(x^2) - 2xy =
y = (x-2)e^(-x^2)

Написао K_Himmelreich, 03.09.2016 at 16:19

Написао Witch-Doctor, 03.09.2016 at 15:24

What is the definite integral from 0 to pi of e^x^2 and how would I take the Laplace transform of the same equation if dy/dx = e^x^2

e^(x^2) doesn't have a true integral Unless express the integral of the function in terms of erf

However Using integrating factor method e^(x^2) - 2xy =
y = (x-2)e^(-x^2)

I asked for the laplace transform. Not to solve the differential.

Написао Tundy, 03.09.2016 at 15:35

Написао Enosia, 03.09.2016 at 15:20

Race is a social construct. There are physical differences between groups of people and differences in skin colour but ultimately there is no other difference.

All dogs are equal!!! Police officers should use chihuahuas as police dogs!!!

"If what you are asking is whether there are human races in the sense that there are dog breeds, the answer is "no".

A breed is a group of domestic animals or plants with homogeneous genotype and phenotype, created by humans through controlled breeding, in other words, through artificial selection. A Boston terrier, for example, is a very defined animal: the parents and grandparents can be certified by the AKC or other Kennnel Clubs who make the rules and decides which dog gets to be a Boston terrier, and which dog is not.

Although humans do show some phenotypic and genotypic variation by geographical origin, the concept is more complicated biologically because there is no precise demarcation, as humans have not been bred by anyone to have certain characteristics. Geographic isolation, and natural or sexual selection, have resulted in some alleles being more frequent in some groups that in others, and ancestry determines the distribution of some genes. That is basically it, from a biological point of view.

But because "race" is also a social construct, it's a much more complex issue than distribution of genotypes. The fact that we say that Obama is the first American black President illustrate the point pretty clearly. Genetics and allele frequencies don't matter much. The fact that most people think in terms of only 4 or 5 "races" is indicative of the strong influence of culture in the way some people perceive what is a human race. Humans have been traveling back and forth and mixing with the locals throughout human history https://www.sciencedaily.com/releases/2014/02/140213142305.htm. We even mixed with archaic humans, like Neanderthals and Denisovans, when we found them in our path http://humanorigins.si.edu/evidence/genetics/ancient-dna-and-neanderthals/interbreeding."

I am the best.

Написао MrArmy987, 03.09.2016 at 15:27

Написао Enosia, 03.09.2016 at 15:20

Race is a social construct. There are physical differences between groups of people and differences in skin colour but ultimately there is no other difference.

Always heard things about black people frequently having more fast twitch muscle fibers, never saw anything official about it, can you enlighten me Himmelreich

(this is for Himmel, just quoted because it was relevant)

West Africans possess more anaerobic enzymes Within their skeletal muscle, which are responsible for regenerating the energy in the muscle cell through anaerobic pathways, this makes them efficient in Endurance and sprinting. Strangely this is not unique to Africans and are found in other populations in other races. The factor may lie that whites or Asians that process this are either never bother to develop this Muscle efficiency or bother to make it Efficient. Thus there is potential if one can train a race a certain way to make it Closer to the advantage of the other and maybe surpass. However a Pure race trained in the same respect will be more efficient in there given Field to which they have the greatest potential for. Think it like this A White Person can never be as fast as an African can potentially be, but a African can never be as Strong as a white potentially can be. However they both can get slightly close. But to Reach or Surpass requires Genetic motivation within a populous, for the race that Can Reach that state. Africans are too thin to reach European strength over evolutionary periods, but they can get faster, for if the focus on strength they will lose speed and if the White Focuses on Improving strength the Black will never reach them. If Europeans want to be as fast or faster they can do it over a long period, but cannot reach the same level if the African continues to develop their Gifted trait of speed and risk losing the gift of strength that they Possess. Now Mixed Breeds lose the Specialization of Strength and Speed, and become averaged out and gaining the genetic weaknesses of both races, Unable to excel in either field, Only able Reach one goal, but unable to surpass the records. Some say that Blacks are stronger than whites (In America), about half of all whites don't bother to Exercise, thus with respect to the traits said earlier about potential, while the white not exercising are not able to match a Mixed Black that does, however if they do, they will surpass the Half Breed as Example.

When looking at Swedes and Kenyans Muscle Fiber Distribution is the same, However Biopsy's show that Kenyans had more blood-carrying capillaries surrounding the muscle fibers and more mitochondria within the fibers. Along with Smaller Muscle Fibers which allow the Mitochondria to be closer to the blood carrying capillaries. This increases Oxidation and allows which allows the Mitochondrion to perform more efficiently. Along with a few other aspects involving the fact that they have more muscle enzymes that burn fat and their glycogen reserves aren't depleted as quickly play a role. Also Kenyan Show slight amounts of ammonia accumulation in there Muscles from Protein combustion, and enjoy less Lactic-acid buildup. Although this is only for Pure Blacks as athletes of West African ancestry are the most anaerobically efficient athletes, East African are the fittest aerobically, and whites fall in the Between. Mixed Blacks show only some traits from the African Pool to an Extent. They are a few other differences. but these are the main.

Basically Blacks excel at anaerobic activities such as sprinting, jumping, And Whites in aerobic sports such as distance running, cycling, and swimming However White are also efficient at lifting, Which is also an anaerobic activity.

Twitch Fibers aren't the cause. If you want a Genetic Profile of Whites Genes rather than the Black I showed, feel free to ask.

Написао Witch-Doctor, 03.09.2016 at 16:28

Написао K_Himmelreich, 03.09.2016 at 16:19

Написао Witch-Doctor, 03.09.2016 at 15:24

What is the definite integral from 0 to pi of e^x^2 and how would I take the Laplace transform of the same equation if dy/dx = e^x^2

e^(x^2) doesn't have a true integral Unless express the integral of the function in terms of erf

However Using integrating factor method e^(x^2) - 2xy =
y = (x-2)e^(-x^2)

I asked for the laplace transform. Not to solve the differential.

Fine if you Laplace Transform dy/dx = e^x^2 it will Equal
y= e^{2x}x+ fraction{1}/{2} (e^{2x} - 2e^{2x}x) + c_1

I did my Best to Use Symbols to Express the solution, as Exponents and Numbers under letters i do not know how to write on the computer

Написао Cheesus_Crust, 03.09.2016 at 16:01

What about other races ? other species (in the case we are so different )

Be more clear, what is the Question

Цитирај:

Цитирај:

But because "race" is also a social construct, it's a much more complex issue than distribution of genotypes. The fact that we say that Obama is the first American black President illustrate the point pretty clearly. Genetics and allele frequencies don't matter much. The fact that most people think in terms of only 4 or 5 "races" is indicative of the strong influence of culture in the way some people perceive what is a human race. Humans have been traveling back and forth and mixing with the locals throughout human history https://www.sciencedaily.com/releases/2014/02/140213142305.htm. We even mixed with archaic humans, like Neanderthals and Denisovans, when we found them in our path http://humanorigins.si.edu/evidence/genetics/ancient-dna-and-neanderthals/interbreeding."

You are wrong is is not a social construct it is science. Obama is not Black, he is a Half breed. Genetics and Alleles define People and you as an individual, saying it doesn't, is like saying the Sky is pink. What is socially seen as race, is the reason for all the ignorant spouting between conflicting parties. Homo-sapiens Breeding with Neanderthals is the birth of The European Genetic Group. Africans do not have Neanderthal DNA, only the Mixed Mongrelized gene pool of The Blacks in North America, because in America, 85% of all the blacks there have at least 25% DNA from White People. The Humans back then are not the same as now, and due to Different mixing of Different Groups lead to Different Attributes to which is seen as race, actually a variation within the Human Species since race only encompasses physical characteristics, and not the other traits and unique properties which can make Humans classified as different Sub-Species. Thus Showing the True Extent of Human Difference.

What is the meaning of life?

What is Death1812's condition called?

Написао Enosia, 03.09.2016 at 16:39

A breed is a group of domestic animals or plants with homogeneous genotype and phenotype, created by humans through controlled breeding, in other words, through artificial selection.

If something is possible via artificial selection, then it is also possible via natural selection. It would just take much more time if it happens at all.

Написао Enosia, 03.09.2016 at 16:39

humans show phenotypic and genotypic variation by natural selection have resulted in some alleles being more frequent in some groups that in others, and ancestry determines the distribution of some genes.

Behind the political correctness, it very much says that humans are different. While ancestry is not a good indicator of differences, it is the best thing we have.

Написао Enosia, 03.09.2016 at 16:39

But because "race" is also a social construct, it's a much more complex issue than distribution of genotypes. The fact that we say that Obama is the first American black President illustrate the point pretty clearly. Genetics and allele frequencies don't matter much. The fact that most people think in terms of only 4 or 5 "races" is indicative of the strong influence of culture in the way some people perceive what is a human race. Humans have been traveling back and forth and mixing with the locals throughout human history https://www.sciencedaily.com/releases/2014/02/140213142305.htm. We even mixed with archaic humans, like Neanderthals and Denisovans, when we found them in our path http://humanorigins.si.edu/evidence/genetics/ancient-dna-and-neanderthals/interbreeding."

;^) I never claimed we are limited to "4-5" races.

---

>Only physical differences
I excluded IQ tests, because comparing Africa to Europe would not be fair.

Nearly 50% of your personality is influenced by genes, is that not significant enough? and curiously this one is up:
Among traits found most strongly determined by heredity were leadership and, surprisingly, traditionalism or obedience to authority.

http://www.nytimes.com/1986/12/02/science/major-personality-study-finds-that-traits-are-mostly-inherited.html

---

https://cepa.stanford.edu/seda/overview

Написао Zephyrusu, 03.09.2016 at 18:23

What is Death1812's condition called?

Autism

Цитирај:

Цитирај:

Написао K_Himmelreich, 03.09.2016 at 17:55

But because "race" is also a social construct, it's a much more complex issue than distribution of genotypes. The fact that we say that Obama is the first American black President illustrate the point pretty clearly. Genetics and allele frequencies don't matter much. The fact that most people think in terms of only 4 or 5 "races" is indicative of the strong influence of culture in the way some people perceive what is a human race. Humans have been traveling back and forth and mixing with the locals throughout human history https://www.sciencedaily.com/releases/2014/02/140213142305.htm. We even mixed with archaic humans, like Neanderthals and Denisovans, when we found them in our path http://humanorigins.si.edu/evidence/genetics/ancient-dna-and-neanderthals/interbreeding."

You are wrong is is not a social construct it is science. Obama is not Black, he is a Half breed. Genetics and Alleles define People and you as an individual, saying it doesn't, is like saying the Sky is pink. What is socially seen as race, is the reason for all the ignorant spouting between conflicting parties. Homo-sapiens Breeding with Neanderthals is the birth of The European Genetic Group. Africans do not have Neanderthal DNA, only the Mixed Mongrelized gene pool of The Blacks in North America, because in America, 85% of all the blacks there have at least 25% DNA from White People. The Humans back then are not the same as now, and due to Different mixing of Different Groups lead to Different Attributes to which is seen as race, actually a variation within the Human Species since race only encompasses physical characteristics, and not the other traits and unique properties which can make Humans classified as different Sub-Species. Thus Showing the True Extent of Human Difference.

"Lewontin's argument
In the 1972 study "The Apportionment of Human Diversity", Richard Lewontin performed a fixation index (FST) statistical analysis using 17 markers, including blood group proteins, from individuals across classically defined "races" (Caucasian, African, Mongoloid, South Asian Aborigines, Amerinds, Oceanians, and, Australian Aborigines). He found that the majority of the total genetic variation between humans (i.e., of the 0.1% of DNA that varies between individuals), 85.4%, is found within populations, 8.3% of the variation is found between populations within a "race", and only 6.3% was found to account for the racial classification. Numerous later studies have confirmed his findings. Based on this analysis, Lewontin concluded, "Since such racial classification is now seen to be of virtually no genetic or taxonomic significance either, no justification can be offered for its continuance."
This argument has been cited as evidence that racial categories are biologically meaningless, and that behavioral differences between groups cannot have any genetic underpinnings. One example is the "Statement on 'Race'" published by the American Anthropological Association in 1998, which rejected the existence of races as unambiguous, clearly demarcated, biologically distinct groups."