|
Написао Guest, 01.02.2014 at 06:41
Playing UN makes you BETTER!? No just no. I'm sorry but only 2 UNs help you with skills. In most UNs, how do you learn how to expand properly? How do you learn economic management well? You have to be poorer countries to learn that, but those countries might die easily.
I only like UN for role play and it's not very intense. I admit to playing it but for the role play. But I just hate it when a fool just sits there doing nothing. All they do is buy countries and boast income.
UN isn't realistic. RL UN doesn't have very much power. Whilst in most UNs they're OP and can take over the world.
How those you stating these things better your life at all.
Учитавање...
Учитавање...
|
Black Hole Профил је обрисан |
Black Hole Профил је обрисан
Написао Guest, 01.02.2014 at 06:41
Playing UN makes you BETTER!? No just no. I'm sorry but only 2 UNs help you with skills. In most UNs, how do you learn how to expand properly? How do you learn economic management well? You have to be poorer countries to learn that, but those countries might die easily.
I only like UN for role play and it's not very intense. I admit to playing it but for the role play. But I just hate it when a fool just sits there doing nothing. All they do is buy countries and boast income.
UN isn't realistic. RL UN doesn't have very much power. Whilst in most UNs they're OP and can take over the world.
How those you stating these things better your life at all.
How does replying to me better your life at all?
Учитавање...
Учитавање...
|
|
Написао Guest, 02.02.2014 at 00:50
Написао Guest, 01.02.2014 at 06:41
Playing UN makes you BETTER!? No just no. I'm sorry but only 2 UNs help you with skills. In most UNs, how do you learn how to expand properly? How do you learn economic management well? You have to be poorer countries to learn that, but those countries might die easily.
I only like UN for role play and it's not very intense. I admit to playing it but for the role play. But I just hate it when a fool just sits there doing nothing. All they do is buy countries and boast income.
UN isn't realistic. RL UN doesn't have very much power. Whilst in most UNs they're OP and can take over the world.
How those you stating these things better your life at all.
How does replying to me better your life at all?
Gives me insite on how a trol thinks
Учитавање...
Учитавање...
|
|
Hey guys,
Well I am presenting a new idea that will change the way we play UN!!!
Its one simple new thing, Uns.
Basically I am replacing the 2 UNS currently and making them NATO Forces while I will have a UN player as well but this player deals with politics, loans, auctions, distribution of land, declaration of war, etc. The UN have direct authority to command NATO Players to kill rogue nations. They specifically are meant for killing rogue nations.
So UN will be practically swiss but with protection and authority of course.
NATO doesn't have to speak a word but must follow rules as if they were UN.
UN must also follow rules but they do not kill rogue nations unless NATO is absent from doing so. (Meaning if NATO players left, rogue, quit, etc..)
Another thing is that UN is the sole player that funds Nato. Nato will not receive a lot of income, only enough to support about 200 black eagles.
Which means NATO will need to request additional funding from UN.
I will post this info on the main topic once I have implemented my idea.
This should reduce rogue nations, Increase political diplomacy, make Role Play a lot better, and of course, more realistic.
Any questions let me know!
----
I'll haunt you, Don't tempt me!
Учитавање...
Учитавање...
|
|
P.S. I will be removing one nation but it will be worth it!
----
I'll haunt you, Don't tempt me!
Учитавање...
Учитавање...
|
Black Hole Профил је обрисан |
Black Hole Профил је обрисан
NATO? Are you serious?
1. They didn't resolve the Kosovo conflict well. Serbians still hate Bosnia, Croatia and Albania.
2. Still didn't defeat the Taliban.
3. Iraq was a failure. People still die, a lot there.
NATO as a world policeman in IRL isn't doing too good. So you made this actually less realistic.
P.S. sorry if I offended you, but I seriously did not see that coming. If I did offend you, I'm sorry.
Учитавање...
Учитавање...
|
|
So basically I will be using japan for my example since I love playing as japan.
Japan says he no longer wishs to be apart of the UN. So he is no longer protected by the UN so anyone can declare war on him. But he can declare war on anyone and the UN cant attack him.
Учитавање...
Учитавање...
|
Black Hole Профил је обрисан |
Black Hole Профил је обрисан
So basically I will be using japan for my example since I love playing as japan.
Japan says he no longer wishs to be apart of the UN. So he is no longer protected by the UN so anyone can declare war on him. But he can declare war on anyone and the UN cant attack him.
That sounds cool actually. Learster did it in Adog's LoN
Учитавање...
Учитавање...
|
|
Yes it sounds cool however anyone could separate from un and then the world is at war at an instant, however I think I have a way to make that work.
I will look into it shanman
----
I'll haunt you, Don't tempt me!
Учитавање...
Учитавање...
|
|
Mk I just think it would be more realistic
Учитавање...
Учитавање...
|
|
Yes definitely, I will try to make it work, I have an idea none the less. I'll let you know when I have worked it out
----
I'll haunt you, Don't tempt me!
Учитавање...
Учитавање...
|
Black Hole Профил је обрисан |
Black Hole Профил је обрисан
Did you read my post why having a NATO is much less realistic?
Учитавање...
Учитавање...
|
|
Написао Guest, 06.02.2014 at 03:41
Did you read my post why having a NATO is much less realistic?
Games don't HAVE to be 100% realistic.If AtWar's gamed were 100% realistic,how fun would it be?0%.
Учитавање...
Учитавање...
|
Black Hole Профил је обрисан |
Black Hole Профил је обрисан
Написао Guest, 06.02.2014 at 03:41
Did you read my post why having a NATO is much less realistic?
Games don't HAVE to be 100% realistic.If AtWar's gamed were 100% realistic,how fun would it be?0%.
But Ghost thinks that it is more realistic with a NATO. Which is false.
Учитавање...
Учитавање...
|
|
No, you assume that's what I think. I did not once say that it's realistic with a NATO in it. I did say however that it would make it more realistic. Basically UN 1 and UN 2 were too powerful, everyone must admit to that. NATO has power but relies on UN for funding, UN however relies on NATO to keep the peace. So what's to be said here is that not only did I make UN and NATO work as a team but they can't go rogue on their own and if they went rogue together, I doubt they can even think of taking over the world, too much debt would be in place and UN would be broke themselves trying to fund the rogue NATOS which means UN would be rogue too.
So systematically I have basically eliminated the chance of NATO and UN of taking over the world while making them a powerful force against rogue nations. I will be increasing UN's funding some more so they can better fund NATO.
What would you rather see? UNS taking over the world or a team based UN system that I alone created to prevent that from happening?
----
I'll haunt you, Don't tempt me!
Учитавање...
Учитавање...
|
|
Another update guys,
I added more states in the USA for now. You will see it when you play my UN next!!!
The following states added are:
Kentucky
Mississippi
Alabama
Georgia
Florida
Carolina (North and South Combined)
and Virginia (both West and Virginia combined with DC)
enjoy!
P.s. I have also reduced the cost of black eagles to 200.
----
I'll haunt you, Don't tempt me!
Учитавање...
Учитавање...
|
|
Hey guys last update for the day!
I have added a couple new units because I appreciate everyone's support for my UN map.
As an appreciation to all my fans, I made 2 stealth units that I think you all will find interesting!
You must play to find out what 2 Units I added.
HINT! THEY GO TOGETHER!!!
----
I'll haunt you, Don't tempt me!
Учитавање...
Учитавање...
|
|
Goddangit how can I play it your not on
Учитавање...
Учитавање...
|
|
Goddangit how can I play it your not on
Учитавање...
Учитавање...
|
Black Hole Профил је обрисан |
Black Hole Профил је обрисан
No, you assume that's what I think. I did not once say that it's realistic with a NATO in it. I did say however that it would make it more realistic. Basically UN 1 and UN 2 were too powerful, everyone must admit to that. NATO has power but relies on UN for funding, UN however relies on NATO to keep the peace. So what's to be said here is that not only did I make UN and NATO work as a team but they can't go rogue on their own and if they went rogue together, I doubt they can even think of taking over the world, too much debt would be in place and UN would be broke themselves trying to fund the rogue NATOS which means UN would be rogue too.
So systematically I have basically eliminated the chance of NATO and UN of taking over the world while making them a powerful force against rogue nations. I will be increasing UN's funding some more so they can better fund NATO.
What would you rather see? UNS taking over the world or a team based UN system that I alone created to prevent that from happening?
1. *facepalm* I just said that you were false, since you said putting NATO in would be more realistic.
2. Cool idea, I admit. But there's a more effective way, a way that requires 2 players. add terrorists, give 100+ defense against UN units. That's the adog way. a UN1 who conquered much of the world got owned by Tunder, who was terrorists.
Учитавање...
Учитавање...
|
|
New ideas.
I had a game where I was NATO and two countries agreed to use nukes. Both NATOS thought this country was rogue while UN did not.
If both NATO's agrees to a policy it is carried out. UN still has more power, but NATO is split into two sections.
NATO 1 has a European base.
----
A gunslinger and the keeper of the torch. Let it burn bright to bring the future we all need.
Учитавање...
Учитавање...
|
|
NATO should also run auctions even though the winners of the auctions **pay** the UN. This way the UN is not so over burdened.
Also if one NATO disagrees with the other, they cannot declare a nation rogue. Only both of them united.
----
A gunslinger and the keeper of the torch. Let it burn bright to bring the future we all need.
Учитавање...
Учитавање...
|
|
Greyavenger,
Thanks for your suggestion, I will look into a way to implement that idea but it won't happen for a bit due to other projects in the way. I still need to finish usa territories, start on Canadian territories, work on Chinese territories, boost NATO funding, add a un base near both NATO HQs incase one or both NATOS leave or go rogue, add new event wars, add a new feature to this un, add a new economic funding system for nations, build a voting box (other people's idea with a twist), UN Investigator Units possibly, and much much more....
I will look into your idea when I can Greyavenger
Ghost-IV
----
I'll haunt you, Don't tempt me!
Учитавање...
Учитавање...
|
|
Update 02/13/2014
5 more hidden NATO Funding Bases per NATO Player
Added UN Contingency base at each NATO base (incase they leave or go rogue)
Added voting system in antarctica
New USA States added and they are as follows:
North Dakota
South Dakota
Minnesota
Nebraska
Kansas
Iowa
Missouri
11 more states to add to the game!!
----
I'll haunt you, Don't tempt me!
Учитавање...
Учитавање...
|
Black Hole Профил је обрисан |
Black Hole Профил је обрисан
Add Kosovo. Then add a event war for it, like the arabs decide to help muslims in Kosovo get independence. It's SEU and Russia vs Turkey and AL
Учитавање...
Учитавање...
|
|
Sure I'll add it to the list Black
----
I'll haunt you, Don't tempt me!
Учитавање...
Учитавање...
|
|
Since japans army is really a defensive force Japan should get a speacial defense unit like korea those also I think North korea is a bit op
Учитавање...
Учитавање...
|
|
NK isn't as strong as SK as SK gets more units but NK receives more income. I only did that to balance the Korean peninsula. Japan already has a special unit with great defense, the navy battle ship. If you look as well on my map japan has pacific islands as well so japan does not have to be strictly defensive, but also offensive, as well as participate in a new event war against the usa, pacific rift (conquer all pacific islands).
----
I'll haunt you, Don't tempt me!
Учитавање...
Учитавање...
|
Black Hole Профил је обрисан |
Black Hole Профил је обрисан
Honestly, I think NK should have more units but SK gets a better economy. It will seem a little bit more realistic. And maybe remove 1 NATO, maybe add Illuminati. Illuminati will be a nation without borders, it's not FFA but it can FFA other countries. Should be rich, since according to conspiracy theorists they control the banks. To go with this idea, give vehicles 0-1 range. Then add a transport unit, oil. Then make it so that vehicles can only be made in factories, but inf only in cities. This will make oil wars a LOT more important and more wars, so the UN ends quicker and is more fun.
Учитавање...
Учитавање...
|
|
NK isn't as strong as SK as SK gets more units but NK receives more income. I only did that to balance the Korean peninsula. Japan already has a special unit with great defense, the navy battle ship. If you look as well on my map japan has pacific islands as well so japan does not have to be strictly defensive, but also offensive, as well as participate in a new event war against the usa, pacific rift (conquer all pacific islands).
Make it the opposite for realism
----
Учитавање...
Учитавање...
|