Купи премиум да би сакрио све рекламе.
Постови: 6   Посвећено од стране: 30 users
28.05.2014 - 04:28
What is less difficult?
To invade from USA to Europe or invade to USA from Europe?

I would like to hear your opinions and explanations.
Учитавање...
Учитавање...
28.05.2014 - 05:02
 Htin
Hard question. Europe>North america. But If it was FFA (asia) can pressure europe.If asia still in war, europe has a chance, to take north america. BUt if a united asia extended from japan to at least India. North AMerica will a great starting place.
----
Hi
Учитавање...
Учитавање...
28.05.2014 - 06:43
Europe is stronger.You may not believe it but:

1.Better income
2.More units.
Учитавање...
Учитавање...
28.05.2014 - 10:02
USA is much easier to invade. The USA consists of only 8 territories, you can stop all USA reinforcements by taking 8 cities. While Europe consists of 7 large countries, and many smaller countries, making it much harder to invade.
----
"Riddle me this, Riddle me that...?" - The Riddler

Учитавање...
Учитавање...
28.05.2014 - 10:57
Stronghold europe.
Учитавање...
Учитавање...
28.05.2014 - 11:28
Europe is easier to invade, since it's way harder to defend when your reinforcements are split in many capitals. Now, if we are talking about fully conquest of the continent, I have no doubt it would be harder to control europe, as the player holding it can recover faster from an attack.
----
"Whenever death may surprise us, let it be welcome if our battle cry has reached even one receptive ear and another hand reaches out to take up our arms".
Учитавање...
Учитавање...
atWar

About Us
Contact

приватност | Услови сервиса | Банери | Partners

Copyright © 2024 atWar. All rights reserved.

Придружи нам се на

Прошири гласине