Strategies
Постови: 123
Посвећено од стране: 1118 users
Првобитни пост
Постављено од стране Yihka, 01.02.2011 - 16:15
Reinforcements
Cities that normally give 1 reinforcement gain +0 reinforcement
Cities that normally give 2-4 reinforcement gain +1 reinforcement
Cities that normally give 5-6 reinforcement gain +2 reinforcement
Cities that normally give 7 and up reinforcement gain +3 reinforcement
Bonusses / Losses
Note the attack/defence behind the name is already set right.
Infantry (4/5)
Infantry lose 1 attack
Infantry lose 1 defence
Tank (5/4)
Tanks lose 2 attack
Tanks lose 1 defence
Marines 4/4
Marines lose 2 attack
Marines lose 1 defence
Militia 3/5:
Stays the same
Battleship (6/5)
Battleship loses 2 attack
Battleship loses 1 defence
Submarine (5/4)
Submarine loses 2 attack
Submarine loses 1 defence
Transport (1/2)
Stays the same
Stealth (4/4):
Stealth loses 2 attack
Stealth loses 1 defence
Bomber (4/4)
Bomber loses 2 attack
Bomber loses 1 defence
Air Transport
Stays the same
Sentry Plane
Stays the same
Basically, all your units get a bit weaker but you will have more reinforcements to use. This might be really useful to make big stacks to scare your enemy or just to have fun with a lot of men.
I did not balance the stats out so it might be unbalanced but it's about the idea generally.
The main reason mods keep them and tend to just leave them is the amount negative feedback received everytime we clean up threads or move stuff... nearly everytime i do this, the creator of the new thread gets upset, sends an email asking why their post was deleted even when a message is sent to them, and it turns into an argument over censorship. The matter has been discussed by mods, and generally, the overall trend seems to be this: better to err on the side of redundancy and bloat, rather than concise on point threads at the cost of censorship. Efforts are made to condense and maintain the FAQ's, but they are exceptionally time consuming given so many players introduce the same ideas repeatedly without reading all the other posts. (I would estimate 3 full time forum moderators would be needed to stay on top of it, and we have no where near this.) That said, if you make the request to merge and provide the posts, i tend to do it right away, since i know if you're making the request, you aren't going to go and make life difficult when i make the changes. ♥
----  
Учитавање...
Учитавање...
|
|
I also agree that is best to let the user to make his own thread about strategy / upgrades / units than rejoining all those information in a single thread. Not by censorship, but because there's often no space to discuss. I understand in the past we need this regrouping, but now we have too many players and this result in a lot of work as you've said. This is what I think you should do: 1) Ask other mods to unstuck the following threads (for this forum): Strategies Upgrades Game Options 2) If mods agree, unstuck those threads. 3) update the FAQ - READ BEFORE POSTING AN IDEA. I can do it if you guys are out of time. 4) Apply the same process to the other forums !
Учитавање...
Учитавање...
|
|
Once html5 is released, remind me to suggest this to mods. (Little point atm, as the changes wouldn't be implemented even if all mods agreed today.)
----
Учитавање...
Учитавање...
|
