USA just attacked Syria

JESUS FUCKING CHRIST.

https://www.youtube.com/results?search_query=milton+friedman+

https://thepiratebay.org/torrent/7548673/Basic_Economics__A_Common_Sense_Guide_to_the_Economy.pdf

If you still believe that communism works, you're delusional

Написао Skanderbeg, 25.04.2018 at 16:13

Написао Al Fappino, 25.04.2018 at 15:24

Написао Skanderbeg, 25.04.2018 at 13:05

Edgy Propaganda

You remind me of those petty saudosists who cling to failed past political experiences and to an abortion of an ideology that came to an existance and still think it was all roses. I don't disregard any of those facts, even the darkest of the regimes have contributed greatly for human civilization.

I still proudly uphold my belief in fierce anti-communism, and my belief in the fall of the evil socio-communist regimes of Venezuela and North Korea, as they portray how mediocre can the human being become.

Communism is an abortion of an ideology, a failed political experience that victimized millions upon millions of people in the past (more than nazifascisms = I'm not defending them, I'm stating) and persist in fooling quite a few million today around the world. It may be good and inspirational on paper, and a tumor in practice. That pretty much summarizes the failure of Communists and Communism and its paladins across the world.

I believe and hope that Communism becomes illegalized and marginalized around the world. If one side of the totalitaristic spectre was illegalized, so can the other vile spectre of totalitarism that Communism represents. I also hope and strongly defend that the Portuguese Communist Party (one of the oldest in europe) gets illegalized aswell, it's a cancerous machine representing a vile ideology.

Communist pricks you so proudly hail persecuted all those against them (including those in my country) under the defense of a violent revolution to change the socioeconomic models of capitalism to a communist society, something that a "traitor" to the Marxists, Bernstein strongly opposed and sadly, was silenced.


Basically, nothing can nullify the evil Communism portrayed, not even the greatest of human breakthroughs, no matter how much you try.

Calls it 'edgy propaganda' then states he doesn't disagree with it. So you agree with propaganda right?

You again make a statement/belief on which you reply, typical strawmen - i never mentioned any communist in my post, but a soviet system - system in a country, not ideology or leader, but you will comfortably ignore this and again post an argument against the comment you see in your head, not in this forum.

If communism have to be banned no matter how much it contributed to civilization, then capitalism as well have to be illegal because it destroyed countries and lives across the globe. You can't have it one way - the way you millenials want it.

You are still viewing communism from western point of view, i told you this multiple times before. Capitalist Russia still didn't reach RSFSR GDP, crime is higher, mortality as well, and opportunities fewer, how do you think to defend capitalism and blame communism? You are blaming communism FROM a developed capitalis nation, which NEVER had an impact on your country.

To call me, out of all people a millenial it's already a fundamental error in character-judgement on my persona,

By condemning Communism, that does not mean I defend capitalism, or even the savage capitalistic globalization we live in today, a good state/socioeconomic-political model would be one that guarantees freedoms to the individuals, and embodies a strong corporativistic element, that raises to subject both sides of the spectres of employer and employee to a common cause that is the State and the Interests of the State, public interest, the raison d'état.

A society where privates would be able to engage freely on their own (private autonomy is key element of society) but ultimately, could not deviate from Public Interest and harm it. There's always going to be "classes" and different sectors of people, as there's a sociocultural disposition "imposed" on people that makes some meant to rule and others to be ruled, but everything should be serving public interest, as a supreme good

Написао Al Fappino, 25.04.2018 at 20:13

To call me, out of all people a millenial it's already a fundamental error in character-judgement on my persona,

By condemning Communism, that does not mean I defend capitalism, or even the savage capitalistic globalization we live in today, a good state/socioeconomic-political model would be one that guarantees freedoms to the individuals, and embodies a strong corporativistic element, that raises to subject both sides of the spectres of employer and employee to a common cause that is the State and the Interests of the State, public interest, the raison d'état.

A society where privates would be able to engage freely on their own (private autonomy is key element of society) but ultimately, could not deviate from Public Interest and harm it. There's always going to be "classes" and different sectors of people, as there's a sociocultural disposition "imposed" on people that makes some meant to rule and others to be ruled, but everything should be serving public interest, as a supreme good

How is that not leftism

Still typical millenial answer. I ask you what real do you propose to replace communism, and you give me book definition from the studies you started 6 months ago. By destroying one system and not replacing it, you create chaos and vacuum, which is hard to repair and recover, therefore you bring more death, violence and destruction. You still didn't learn anything.

Написао avatar, 15.04.2018 at 05:40

Jesus Christ... and this is not propaganda, agitprop, regime news, state-owned outlet... West is so lost, if they don't realize what dictatorship they've become.

I keep hearing from slavic friends who live in the west how their countries are police state, i didn't believe them because i thought they are soft, but now i understand.

Написао Skanderbeg, 26.04.2018 at 13:00

Написао Al Fappino, 25.04.2018 at 20:13

To call me, out of all people a millenial it's already a fundamental error in character-judgement on my persona,

By condemning Communism, that does not mean I defend capitalism, or even the savage capitalistic globalization we live in today, a good state/socioeconomic-political model would be one that guarantees freedoms to the individuals, and embodies a strong corporativistic element, that raises to subject both sides of the spectres of employer and employee to a common cause that is the State and the Interests of the State, public interest, the raison d'état.

A society where privates would be able to engage freely on their own (private autonomy is key element of society) but ultimately, could not deviate from Public Interest and harm it. There's always going to be "classes" and different sectors of people, as there's a sociocultural disposition "imposed" on people that makes some meant to rule and others to be ruled, but everything should be serving public interest, as a supreme good

How is that not leftism

Still typical millenial answer. I ask you what real do you propose to replace communism, and you give me book definition from the studies you started 6 months ago. By destroying one system and not replacing it, you create chaos and vacuum, which is hard to repair and recover, therefore you bring more death, violence and destruction. You still didn't learn anything.

It is not socialism, as I believe individuals have a predisposition based on the environment they're brought up in to rule or to be ruled, to be commanders and to be commanded.

I also ciment Public Interest as a synonym to the State, that's my main axis of thought.

Basically (and now to further ciment my point, I was on a rush to finish an Essay on Richelieu's Political Testament when I wrote the other stuff xd)

Every individual is part of the State, and the State is the concretized/realized in the individual itself, the two realities on an abstract point of view do not differ. And why do they not differ?

Because the State can be identified as the public good, the collective good, the public interest if we may call that, the State is the embodiment of all those principles that guide the political community which it concerns to.
So, the individual must be at service of the State, his actions must provide, must contribute for the State, and thus, the national collective good, the public interest and the Nation will come out benefited.

Given this supremacy of the State, what I mean is that the State, on a superior point of view, is the center of society; on a concrete point of view, is the individual, that, given its singular characteristics and diversity, enriches the State, diversifying it and further enriching itself, by various means: culturally, economically, politically - In short, everything must serve a common, ulterior purpose that benefits society, and thus the Nation, the State.

To help ciment stability, prosperity and peace in the State and in its society there must be no grave discord, there must be no struggles or internal strife, ideally of course (it's an utopia to think human beings, an agressive animal by nature, will always stay peaceful). So basically, there should not be free-willed unions, because if the State is provided by all, it necessarily has to provide for all, to unleash the individual's further capabilities that ultimately benefit the State. Given this, we should encompass a Corporativistic-side for society. We (the State) should promote concord between Employer and Employee, between ruler and ruled, and harmonize their common subjects in a way that becomes equally and fairly just for both parts. Basically, we'd seek to mitigate discord through submission and harmonization of interests, that would ultimately serve the State, and both sides aswell.

Taking the example of Portugal's New State, we could even have a Corporativistic Chamber, that during the New State, was nothing more than a technocratic assembly, with experts of the various sectors of society that advised the State in prossecuting the common good - Something my Professor-Regent has illustrated as very interesting and important to implement, which I agree.

Taking on all this, this does not mean privates would be anihilated, private enterprise would of course be allowed, as it's an elementary right to the human being, but the State would have to regulate it so that not only would benefit the private, but also the public - regulations would basically be a crackdown on edgy conducts and what not.

Now, don't feel like extensively writing about this, one day during the next few days if I ever come to write my thought I'll share it xd

HOW DOES EVERY TOPIC END UP BEING ABOUT THE F@#$cking BALKAN PEOPLE OR SLAVS WHATEVER THEY ARE CAALED FFS, those guys are so obsessed with themselves smh

Написао Dead Weight, 30.04.2018 at 20:47

HOW DOES EVERY TOPIC END UP BEING ABOUT THE F@#$cking BALKAN PEOPLE OR SLAVS WHATEVER THEY ARE CAALED FFS, those guys are so obsessed with themselves smh