Allow Host Kick Anyone

Rp game China invades world and fail rp's whole thing I the host cannot kick him. Simple as that

No

Makes for corrupt host in world games kicks everyone to get tons fo sp.

Alright so add a poll option? China literally ruined the entire RP game by simply invading westwards against everyone in the middle east I asked for him to give a cause he refused to provide a legitimate one and I could not do anything
By that logic there is no reason to play RP because I can just invade everyone and ignore the rules agreed upon by those joining an RP game

Easily abuseable.

So as a host you can kick someone out of a game, only if they have been inactive for 3 turns, right? But if someone is inactive for three turns, then they are timed out and automatically kicked out of the game, right? So what is the point of having a "kick player" option for the host? If you are the host of a game, you should have certain amount of control over the game, like kicking a player who you don't want in your game, or not allowing people to change options of the game and so on. Yes this could be abused, just like so many other things in the game, and which most of already are abused. F.E.: Like a rank 9 host changing the turn time limit from 4 min to 1 min so as to throw the rank 5 player off as he's about to invade and crush the rank 9. How is that not abuse and even cheating? If hosts were allowed to kick players from games at will, yes this will most likely be abused, but I believe players will simply not play games hosted by players who act like that. Kick me once so what, kick me twice, I'll never play a game with you as host again, ever. Called freedom of choice. As far as kicking players to gain sp, if there are no opponents then it's a solo game and you gain no sp for solo games. Even if you have 3 players and 2 are allied and you kick the third out, you shouldn't win for that, the game should end in someway where you either gain no sp or a diminished amount versus finishing the game out normally. Just my thoughts on this.

Написао Necrolight, 16.06.2014 at 21:49

Alright so add a poll option? China literally ruined the entire RP game by simply invading westwards against everyone in the middle east I asked for him to give a cause he refused to provide a legitimate one and I could not do anything
By that logic there is no reason to play RP because I can just invade everyone and ignore the rules agreed upon by those joining an RP game

world domination prbably why he rouge

This is the most stupid idea I have ever read, the op should be ban from forum.

This has been discussed many times before. Main reason it hadn't been implemented is: gives space for abuse!
Final answer: NO!

Написао Tundy, 17.06.2014 at 10:54

This is the most stupid idea I have ever read, the op should be ban from forum.

As stupid as playing RP?

Написао Columna Durruti, 17.06.2014 at 12:12

Написао Tundy, 17.06.2014 at 10:54

This is the most stupid idea I have ever read, the op should be ban from forum.

As stupid as playing RP?

If they implement this idea, I won't be capable of farmi... "Obtaining" 12k daily sp by going rogue in RP.
I would always get kicked if this is implemented lol

Написао Tundy, 17.06.2014 at 12:23

Написао Columna Durruti, 17.06.2014 at 12:12

Написао Tundy, 17.06.2014 at 10:54

This is the most stupid idea I have ever read, the op should be ban from forum.

As stupid as playing RP?

If they implement this idea, I won't be capable of farmi... "Obtaining" 12k daily sp by going rogue in RP.
I would always get kicked if this is implemented lol

No, if they implemented this idea you wold start hosting RP and UN games!

Написао Columna Durruti, 17.06.2014 at 12:11

This has been discussed many times before. Main reason it hadn't been implemented is: gives space for abuse!
Final answer: NO!

Between the verbal abuse and the abuse of option changing during the game and all the other what nots that get abused daily, what's one more thing for people to abuse? Besides would it not allow players to control who's in their game and help prevent, or even minimize, trolling? And are you not a Mod? Who are you to decide what gets implemented or not? Since when did Mods become in control of programming? Would this not be decision for the Admins and/or Developers? Shouldn't you be spending your time stopping the vulgar abuse in the chat rooms and enforcing Atwar rules and policies? I think until someone with real authority answers the question there is no final answer. I apologize if you don't like my opinion, but hey, everyone's entitled to have one, whether we want to hear it or not.

I've been in many games against multiple players where, had they the option to kick me, they would have. And I wasn't breaking any rules agreed or playing RP. I believe while you guys might think this is a good idea, it might not be and would end up allowing for a lot of grief if it were implemented.

Написао Warmonger Dak, 17.06.2014 at 13:04

Написао Columna Durruti, 17.06.2014 at 12:11

This has been discussed many times before. Main reason it hadn't been implemented is: gives space for abuse!
Final answer: NO!

Between the verbal abuse and the abuse of option changing during the game and all the other what nots that get abused daily, what's one more thing for people to abuse? Besides would it not allow players to control who's in their game and help prevent, or even minimize, trolling? And are you not a Mod? Who are you to decide what gets implemented or not? Since when did Mods become in control of programming? Would this not be decision for the Admins and/or Developers? Shouldn't you be spending your time stopping the vulgar abuse in the chat rooms and enforcing Atwar rules and policies? I think until someone with real authority answers the question there is no final answer. I apologize if you don't like my opinion, but hey, everyone's entitled to have one, whether we want to hear it or not.

This issue has been discussed before, like I said. It was then decided that after beginning a game there should not be the option of kicking a player (with the exception if he is AFK for 3 or more turns; which does not occur automatically!). It is not "just" my opinion that was posted but rather the result of a discussion.
The problem of trolls, abusers, farmers, etc. cannot (and shall not) be resolved by a tool that induces to misuse. How can a host kick a player just like that after the game has started? Are you serious???
There is always the option of kicking a player during the country selection phase and the map/scenario banlist that is being implemented.
Not really a matter that has to be discussed with Admins... just use some logic and common sense!

Yes I am serious. Why not? The parameters a host sets for a game can be changed anytime during the game on a whim, right? You can change how many alliances are allowed, How long the turns last, joining/rejoining/instant joining, and # of players. So if all these can be changed, and not just by the host, why not allow the kicking of players after the beginning of a game? I mean really it can't screw it up anymore than the changing of options during a game and the almost constant verbal abuse on chats. You want an example, look at the end of Pulses post, I find it offensive that he should have "massive fag" on his post, and yet there it is, and this is from a Mod, great example for Atwar players.

Написао Warmonger Dak, 17.06.2014 at 13:50

Yes I am serious. Why not? The parameters a host sets for a game can be changed anytime during the game on a whim, right? You can change how many alliances are allowed, How long the turns last, joining/rejoining/instant joining, and # of players. So if all these can be changed, and not just by the host, why not allow the kicking of players after the beginning of a game? I mean really it can't screw it up anymore than the changing of options during a game and the almost constant verbal abuse on chats. You want an example, look at the end of Pulses post, I find it offensive that he should have "massive fag" on his post, and yet there it is, and this is from a Mod, great example for Atwar players.

Just enemy list the people who dont play ur Rps right and when u host the next Rp just kick whose on ur enemy list. Giving host more in game power causes more harm than good. Thats why it will never pass. And Pulses post is not offensive u just read it wrong and its a quote from some else not Pulses own words.

As said by Goblin; wouldn't use his aggressive language but the content is correct.
Emperor Lelouch also makes a point.

First Emperor Lelouch, I don't play RPs, once or twice to see what it was about but not for along time. Second, all of you are missing the big picture, which is, it can't cause anymore harm then what's already going on. Do I really expect the ability to kick a player to be implemented? No. But why is it even an option to click on during the game then? Sort of misleading, don't you think? So while we sit here and say " Oh it would be abused, it can't be implemented because of that." mean time other abuses which can be controlled and stopped continue on. Such as Pulses post, no he did not say Fag, which is offensive by the way, he is just reposted it, and how many times over? Everytime he posts on the forum? But hey, he didn't say it, he just posted it with his comments, no big deal, just keep on, keeping on, that way nothin's really a big deal, or ever changes, because there's no abuse here, right? When is enough going to be enough?

Написао Warmonger Dak, 17.06.2014 at 15:57

First Emperor Lelouch, I don't play RPs, once or twice to see what it was about but not for along time. Second, all of you are missing the big picture, which is, it can't cause anymore harm then what's already going on. Do I really expect the ability to kick a player to be implemented? No. But why is it even an option to click on during the game then? Sort of misleading, don't you think? So while we sit here and say " Oh it would be abused, it can't be implemented because of that." mean time other abuses which can be controlled and stopped continue on. Such as Pulses post, no he did not say Fag, which is offensive by the way, he is just reposted it, and how many times over? Everytime he posts on the forum? But hey, he didn't say it, he just posted it with his comments, no big deal, just keep on, keeping on, that way nothin's really a big deal, or ever changes, because there's no abuse here, right? When is enough going to be enough?

You can kick players if you are in country selection phase (Turn 0) and/or if player has been AFK for 3 or more turns (he does not disconnect for time out automatically).
And NO to ability to kick players from ongoing game. The very title of the thread "Allow Host Kick Anyone" is not correct from turn 1 onwards.

I agree with mods on this, easily abusable. let's Quote CD

"Final answer: NO!"

Lock this topic please no need for discussion

Написао Columna Durruti, 17.06.2014 at 15:57

As said by Goblin; wouldn't use his aggressive language but the content is correct.
Emperor Lelouch also makes a point.

"aggressive language"? Wow, I'd call that profane and vulgar. Wouldn't you? I'm just trying to figure out how his "aggressive language" is polite. Is that not part of the Atwar rules, be polite to other players?

RP can die !!!!!

Написао Professor Adog, 17.06.2014 at 16:03

Support kicking options!

support

Написао Goblin, 17.06.2014 at 17:00

Написао Warmonger Dak, 17.06.2014 at 16:04

"aggressive language"? Wow, I'd call that profane and vulgar. Wouldn't you? I'm just trying to figure out how his "aggressive language" is polite. Is that not part of the Atwar rules, be polite to other players?

Well pardon my language, but im guessing you were never in a game for 3 hours which you were wining and then others started voting out options to make it impossible for you to finish the game ...was that polite toward me or any other player that expirienced this kind of politness?

If there was an option to kick me out of the game by simple voting from the rest of the players or god forbid host ...i would never play this game again or would only play the games i host.

My apologies to you, I was not attacking you directly, just using your use of language as an example to the impoliteness that already exists in the Atwar chats. And no that was not polite to you or the other players, and if you had read my first post, you would know that you guessed wrong, I have experienced the same thing as you and it sucks. Anyways just a side note, I am beginning to think that my sarcasm is lost on this crowd.

For RP and other games with rules, is this not the reason why ban lists are included?

People abusing chat is the reason why we have mods.

If there is a problem get evidence and there is probably a way to deal with it. Instant kicking opens up too many bad options and is not neccesary. If you know someone will cause a problem kick him before game start and set turn joining to 0.

>let's people play for 3 hours, when pool list is like 15k
>mass kicks everybody

$$$$$$

First post is a suggestion and the only problem ive found in 5 days of playing, and yet now i have two, get a better fucking community this is one of the rudest ive ever seen before. Not only am blatantly told im wrong with no explanation Im outright insulted and called names and for what giving a suggestion? Seriously Fuck every person here who simply posted an insult or said my idea was stupid without giving any explanation. Doubt ill bother coming back to the forums for this game.

So many large word blocks

Oh god aside from the fact that china conquered the world for a reason, this would make up for so much trolling, belive me killing the host of a game, and before he dies, he just kicks me because he is loosing...wowe